Maderson Paul F A, Hillenius Willem J, Hiller Uwe, Dove Carla C
Department of Biology, Brooklyn College of CUNY, New York 11210, USA.
J Morphol. 2009 Oct;270(10):1166-208. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10747.
Understanding of the regeneration of feathers, despite a 140 year tradition of study, has remained substantially incomplete. Moreover, accumulated errors and mis-statements in the literature have confounded the intrinsic difficulties in describing feather regeneration. Lack of allusion to Rudall's (Rudall [1947] Biochem Biophys Acta 1:549-562) seminal X-ray diffraction study that revealed two distinct keratins, beta- and alpha-, in a mature feather, is one of the several examples where lack of citation long inhibited progress in understanding. This article reviews and reevaluates the available literature and provides a synthetic, comprehensive, morphological model for the regeneration of a generalized, adult contour feather. Particular attention is paid to several features that have previously been largely ignored. Some of these, such as the beta-keratogenic sheath and the alpha-keratogenic, supra-umbilical, pulp caps, are missing from mature, functional feathers sensu stricto because they are lost through preening, but these structures nevertheless play a critical role in development. A new developmental role for a tissue unique to feathers, the medullary pith of the rachis and barb rami, and especially its importance in the genesis of the superior umbilical region (SUR) that forms the transition from the spathe (rachis and vanes) to the calamus, is described. It is postulated that feathers form through an intricate interplay between cyto- and histodifferentiative processes, determined by patterning signals that emanate from the dermal core, and a suite of interacting biomechanical forces. Precisely regulated patterns of loss of intercellular adhesivity appear to be the most fundamental aspect of feather morphogenesis and regeneration: rather than a hierarchically branched structure, it appears more appropriate to conceive of feathers as a sheet of mature keratinocytes that is "full of holes.
尽管对羽毛再生的研究已有140年的传统,但对其的理解仍存在很大的不足。此外,文献中积累的错误和错误陈述使描述羽毛再生的内在困难更加复杂。未能提及鲁德尔(鲁德尔[1947]《生物化学与生物物理学报》1:549 - 562)具有开创性的X射线衍射研究,该研究揭示了成熟羽毛中两种不同的角蛋白,β - 角蛋白和α - 角蛋白,这是缺乏引用长期阻碍理解进展的几个例子之一。本文回顾并重新评估了现有文献,并为成年通用轮廓羽毛的再生提供了一个综合、全面的形态学模型。特别关注了一些以前基本被忽视的特征。其中一些特征,如β - 角蛋白生成鞘和α - 角蛋白生成的脐上髓帽,在严格意义上的成熟功能羽毛中并不存在,因为它们在梳理过程中丢失了,但这些结构在发育中仍然起着关键作用。本文描述了羽毛特有的一种组织——羽轴和羽枝髓质的新发育作用,尤其是其在形成从羽片(羽轴和羽片)到羽根过渡的上脐区(SUR)形成中的重要性。据推测,羽毛通过细胞和组织分化过程之间的复杂相互作用形成,这些过程由来自真皮核心的模式信号以及一系列相互作用的生物力学力决定。细胞间粘附性丧失的精确调控模式似乎是羽毛形态发生和再生最基本的方面:与其将羽毛看作是分层分支结构,将其视为一片“布满孔洞”的成熟角质形成细胞似乎更为合适。