Hurley J R
Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824.
J Clin Psychol. 1991 Jul;47(4):576-82. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:4<576::aid-jclp2270470417>3.0.co;2-r.
After 50 hours of small group participation during 9 weeks, 91 young adults rated each same-group member's conduct on SYMLOG's dimensions of dominance, friendliness, and task-orientedness. Earlier, they made similar ratings twice, several weeks apart, on separate measures of self-acceptance and acceptance of others. Individuals' mean SYMLOG dominance ratings by group peers correlated much more highly with aggregated ratings for self-acceptance (.83) than for other-acceptance (.02), while SYMLOG friendliness correlated more positively with acceptance of others (.85) than with self-acceptance (.05). Self-ratings yielded parallel, but weaker associations. After attenuation corrections, these divergent approaches to assessing the interpersonal domain's central dimensions yielded empirically equivalent results. Both methods provide measures relevant to small group processes.
在9周内经过50小时的小组参与后，91名年轻人根据SYMLOG的支配性、友好性和任务导向性维度对同组每个成员的行为进行了评分。早些时候，他们在相隔几周的时间里，对自我接纳和他人接纳的不同测量指标进行了两次类似的评分。与他人接纳的聚合评分（0.02）相比，个体在小组同伴中的平均SYMLOG支配性评分与自我接纳的聚合评分（0.83）的相关性要高得多，而SYMLOG友好性与他人接纳（0.85）的正相关性比与自我接纳（0.05）更高。自我评分产生了平行但较弱的关联。经过衰减校正后，这些评估人际领域核心维度的不同方法产生了经验上等效的结果。两种方法都提供了与小组过程相关的测量指标。
