• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用具有柔软硅胶粘合剂技术的伤口敷料。

Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.

作者信息

Morris Clare, Emsley Paulene, Marland Elizabeth, Meuleneire Frans, White Richard

机构信息

North East Wales NHS Trust, Wrexham.

出版信息

Paediatr Nurs. 2009 Apr;21(3):38-43. doi: 10.7748/paed2009.04.21.3.38.c7037.

DOI:10.7748/paed2009.04.21.3.38.c7037
PMID:19397129
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate how pain, during and in-between dressing changes, is affected by the introduction of Mepilex Border Lite, a wound dressing manufactured by Mölnlycke Health Care using Safetac soft silicone adhesive technology, to the treatment of different types of paediatric wounds/skin injuries.

METHODS

Wounds/skin injuries that met the criteria for inclusion in the study were dressed with Mepilex Border Lite. Patients were followed for six weeks or until their wounds/skin injuries had healed, whichever occurred earlier. At each dressing change, pain severity before and during dressing removal was rated by the patient and the investigator on a scale from zero (no pain at all) to ten (worst pain ever). Other variables measured included: signs of trauma to wound/skin injury and surrounding skin, the proportion of viable/non-viable tissue, the quantity and appearance of exudate, odour, and clinical signs of infection. At the final dressing change, patients and investigators completed questionnaires to rate the dressing performance.

RESULTS

Mean pain severity scores were significantly lower (p < or = 0.003) at the first dressing change than at baseline. Over 99.5 per cent of the Mepilex Border Lite dressing changes were reported to be atraumatic and more than half of the wounds healed within the study period. Conformability, ease of use, ease of removal, patient comfort, and overall experience with the dressing were rated as 'good' to 'very good' at the vast majority of final visit evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides further evidence of the ability of dressings with Safetac soft silicone adhesive technology to minimise trauma and pain and demonstrates the ability of Mepilex Border Lite to overcome the clinical challenges associated with the use of dressings on the wounds/skin injuries of paediatric patients.

摘要

目的

评估在不同类型儿科伤口/皮肤损伤的治疗中,使用莫林医疗保健公司采用Safetac软硅胶粘合剂技术生产的伤口敷料美皮康轻边敷料(Mepilex Border Lite),对换药期间及换药间隔期疼痛的影响。

方法

符合研究纳入标准的伤口/皮肤损伤使用美皮康轻边敷料进行包扎。对患者进行为期六周的随访,或直至其伤口/皮肤损伤愈合,以先发生者为准。每次换药时,由患者和研究者按照从0分(完全无痛)至10分(有史以来最剧烈的疼痛)的量表对换药前和换药过程中的疼痛严重程度进行评分。测量的其他变量包括:伤口/皮肤损伤及周围皮肤的创伤迹象、存活/非存活组织的比例、渗出液的量和外观、气味以及感染的临床体征。在最后一次换药时,患者和研究者完成问卷以对敷料性能进行评分。

结果

首次换药时的平均疼痛严重程度评分显著低于基线水平(p≤0.003)。据报告,超过99.5%的美皮康轻边敷料换药操作无创伤,且超过半数的伤口在研究期间愈合。在绝大多数最终访视评估中,敷料的贴合性、易用性、易去除性、患者舒适度及总体体验被评为“良好”至“非常好”。

结论

本研究进一步证明了采用Safetac软硅胶粘合剂技术的敷料能够将创伤和疼痛降至最低,并表明美皮康轻边敷料有能力克服在儿科患者伤口/皮肤损伤上使用敷料所面临的临床挑战。

相似文献

1
Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.使用具有柔软硅胶粘合剂技术的伤口敷料。
Paediatr Nurs. 2009 Apr;21(3):38-43. doi: 10.7748/paed2009.04.21.3.38.c7037.
2
A multicentre clinical evaluation of Cuticell Contact silicone wound contact layer in daily practice.日常实践中Cuticell Contact硅酮伤口接触层的多中心临床评估。
Br J Community Nurs. 2015 Jun;Suppl Community Wound Care:S35-6, S38-41. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.Sup6.S35.
3
Mepitel: a non-adherent wound dressing with Safetac technology.美皮贴:一款采用赛肤泰克技术的非粘性伤口敷料。
Br J Nurs. 2009;18(1):58-64. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.1.93582.
4
Silver-containing foam dressings with Safetac: a review of the scientific and clinical data.含Safetac的含银泡沫敷料:科学与临床数据综述
J Wound Care. 2017 Jun 1;26(Sup6a):S1-S32. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup6a.S1.
5
Evaluation study of the properties of two adhesive foam dressings.两种粘性泡沫敷料性能的评估研究
Br J Nurs. 2003 Jun;12(11 Suppl):S43-4, S46-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2003.12.Sup2.11326.
6
Mepilex Ag: an antimicrobial, absorbent foam dressing with Safetac technology.美皮康银:一款采用赛肤润技术的抗菌吸收性泡沫敷料。
Br J Nurs. 2009;18(20):S28, S30-6. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.Sup7.45133.
7
Evidence review: the clinical benefits of Safetac technology in wound care.证据综述:Safetac技术在伤口护理中的临床益处。
J Wound Care. 2008 Nov;Suppl:3-31.
8
An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.在养老院环境中对粘性水凝胶泡沫敷料和自粘软硅胶泡沫敷料的评估。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Aug;49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58.
9
An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives.伤口敷料粘合剂的皮肤剥离评估。
J Wound Care. 2011 Sep;20(9):412, 414, 416-22. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2011.20.9.412.
10
Use of a new, flexible lipidocolloid dressing on acute and chronic wounds: results of a clinical study.新型柔性脂质胶体敷料在急慢性伤口上的应用:一项临床研究结果
J Wound Care. 2011 Apr;20(4):180, 182-5. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2011.20.4.180.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluid handling by foam wound dressings: From engineering theory to advanced laboratory performance evaluations.泡沫伤口敷料的液体处理:从工程理论到先进的实验室性能评估。
Int Wound J. 2024 Feb;21(2):e14674. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14674.
2
Global variation in skin injures and skincare practices in extremely preterm infants.极早产儿皮肤损伤与皮肤护理实践的全球差异。
World J Pediatr. 2023 Feb;19(2):139-157. doi: 10.1007/s12519-022-00625-2. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
3
Plasma-Initiated Grafting of Bioactive Peptide onto Nano-CuO/Tencel Membrane.
生物活性肽在纳米CuO/Tencel膜上的等离子体引发接枝
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Oct 24;14(21):4497. doi: 10.3390/polym14214497.
4
How Should Clinical Wound Care and Management Translate to Effective Engineering Standard Testing Requirements from Foam Dressings? Mapping the Existing Gaps and Needs.泡沫敷料的临床伤口护理和管理如何转化为有效的工程标准测试要求?映射现有差距和需求。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2024 Jan;13(1):34-52. doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0173. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injury Associated with Surgical Wound Dressing among Spinal Surgery Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.医用黏胶相关性皮肤损伤与脊柱手术患者的外科伤口敷料相关:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 30;18(17):9150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179150.
6
Porcine Xenograft and Epidermal Fully Synthetic Skin Substitutes in the Treatment of Partial-Thickness Burns: A Literature Review.猪异种移植和表皮完全合成皮肤替代物治疗浅度烧伤:文献综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 30;57(5):432. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050432.
7
Amplicon-based skin microbiome profiles collected by tape stripping with different adhesive film dressings: a comparative study.基于扩增子的皮肤微生物组谱通过不同粘性膜敷料的胶带剥离采集:一项比较研究。
BMC Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02122-4.
8
Heel Pressure Injuries: Consensus-Based Recommendations for Assessment and Management.足跟压疮:评估和管理的基于共识的推荐建议。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2020 Jun;9(6):332-347. doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1042. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
9
Effect of non-adhering dressings on promotion of fibroblast proliferation and wound healing in vitro.非粘性敷料对体外促进成纤维细胞增殖和伤口愈合的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 13;9(1):4320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40921-y.
10
Dressings and Products in Pediatric Wound Care.儿科伤口护理中的敷料与产品
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014 Apr 1;3(4):324-334. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0477.