Branstetter-Rost Ann, Cushing Christopher, Douleh Tanya
Department of Psychology, Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri 65804, USA.
J Pain. 2009 Aug;10(8):887-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
Previous research suggests that acceptance is a promising alternative to distraction and control techniques in successfully coping with pain. Acceptance interventions based upon Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) have been shown to lead to greater tolerance of acute pain as well as increased adjustment and less disability among individuals with chronic pain. However, in these previous intervention studies, the ACT component of values has either not been included or not specifically evaluated. The current study compares the effects of an ACT-based acceptance intervention with and without the values component among individuals completing the cold-pressor task. Results indicate that inclusion of the values component (n = 34) of ACT leads to significantly greater pain tolerance than acceptance alone (n = 30). Consistent with previous research, both conditions were associated with greater pain tolerance than control (n = 35). Despite the difference in tolerance, pain threshold did not differ, and participants in the control condition provided lower ratings of pain severity. The findings from this study support the important role of values and values clarification in acceptance-based interventions such as ACT, and provide direction for clinicians working with individuals with chronic pain conditions.
This article evaluates the additive effect of including a personalized-values exercise in an acceptance-based treatment for pain. Results indicate that values interventions make a significant contribution and improvement to acceptance interventions, which may be of interest to clinicians who provide psychological treatment to individuals with chronic pain.
先前的研究表明,在成功应对疼痛方面,接纳是一种比分散注意力和控制技巧更有前景的替代方法。基于接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)的接纳干预已被证明能使个体对急性疼痛有更高的耐受性,同时能增强慢性疼痛患者的适应能力并减少残疾程度。然而,在这些先前的干预研究中,ACT中的价值观部分要么未被纳入,要么未得到专门评估。本研究比较了在完成冷加压任务的个体中,包含价值观部分和不包含价值观部分的基于ACT的接纳干预的效果。结果表明,包含ACT价值观部分(n = 34)的干预比单纯的接纳干预(n = 30)能带来显著更高的疼痛耐受性。与先前研究一致,两种干预条件下的疼痛耐受性均高于对照组(n = 35)。尽管在耐受性上存在差异,但疼痛阈值并无不同,且对照组参与者对疼痛严重程度的评分更低。本研究结果支持了价值观及价值观澄清在基于接纳的干预(如ACT)中的重要作用,并为治疗慢性疼痛患者的临床医生提供了指导。
本文评估了在基于接纳的疼痛治疗中加入个性化价值观练习的附加效果。结果表明,价值观干预对接纳干预有显著贡献和改善,这可能会引起为慢性疼痛患者提供心理治疗的临床医生的兴趣。