• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《洛克婴儿记录婴幼儿养护指南》:医生会使用它吗?他们觉得它有用吗?使用它是否能改善他们的健康婴儿检查记录?

The Rourke Baby Record Infant/Child Maintenance Guide: do doctors use it, do they find it useful, and does using it improve their well-baby visit records?

作者信息

Rourke Leslie, Godwin Marshall, Rourke James, Pearce Sarah, Bean Joyce

机构信息

Discipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St, John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Apr 30;10:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-28.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-10-28
PMID:19402912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2688494/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Rourke Baby Record (RBR) - http://www.rourkebabyrecord.ca - is a freely available evidence-based structured form for child health surveillance from zero to five years. Family physicians/general practitioners (FP/GPs) doing office based well-baby care in three Ontario Canada cities (London, Ottawa, and Toronto) were randomly sampled to study the prevalence and utility of the RBR and documentation of well-baby visits.

METHODS

Database with telephone confirmation was conducted to assess the prevalence of use of the RBR. Study Part 1: Questionnaire mailed to a random sample of 100 RBR users. Outcome measures were utility of, helpfulness of, and suggestions for the RBR. Descriptive analysis was employed. Study Part 2: Retrospective chart review of well-baby visits by 38 FP/GPs using student t-tests and factor analysis. Outcome measures were well-baby visit documentation of growth, nutrition, safety issues, developmental milestones, physical examination, and overall comprehensiveness.

RESULTS

The RBR was used by 78.5% (402/512) of successfully contacted FP/GPs who did well-baby care in these 3 cities. Study Part 1: Questionnaire respondents (N = 41/100) used the RBR in several ways, and found it most helpful for assessing healthy child development, charting/recording the visits, managing time effectively, addressing parent concerns, identifying health problems, and identifying high risk situations. The RBR was seen to be least helpful as a tool for managing or for referring identified health problems. Study Part 2: Charts from a total of 1,378 well-baby visits on 176 children were audited. Well-baby care provided by the 20 FP/GPs who used the RBR compared to that by the 18 non-users was statistically more likely to include documentation of type of feeding (p = 0.023), discussion of safety issues (p < 0.001), assessment of development (p = 0.001), and overall comprehensiveness (p < 0.001). Well-baby care provided by the RBR users compared to that by the non-users was not more likely to include documentation of measurement of growth (p = 0.097), or physical examination (p = 0.828).

CONCLUSION

The RBR was widely used by FP/GPs in these settings. RBR users found it helpful for many purposes, and had a consistently high rate of documentation of many aspects of well-baby care. The Rourke Baby Record has become a de facto gold standard clinical practice tool in knowledge translation for pediatric preventive medicine and health surveillance for primary care pediatric providers.

摘要

背景

Rourke婴儿记录(RBR)——http://www.rourkebabyrecord.ca——是一种免费的、基于证据的结构化表格,用于0至5岁儿童健康监测。在加拿大安大略省的三个城市(伦敦、渥太华和多伦多)从事门诊健康婴儿护理的家庭医生/全科医生(FP/GP)被随机抽样,以研究RBR的使用情况、实用性以及健康婴儿访视的记录情况。

方法

通过电话确认建立数据库,以评估RBR的使用情况。研究第一部分:向100名RBR用户的随机样本邮寄问卷。结果指标包括RBR的实用性、帮助程度以及相关建议。采用描述性分析。研究第二部分:对38名FP/GP的健康婴儿访视记录进行回顾性图表审查,使用学生t检验和因子分析。结果指标包括健康婴儿访视中关于生长、营养、安全问题、发育里程碑、体格检查以及整体全面性的记录情况。

结果

在这三个城市从事健康婴儿护理的成功联系到的FP/GP中,78.5%(402/512)使用了RBR。研究第一部分:问卷受访者(N = 41/100)以多种方式使用RBR,发现它在评估健康儿童发育、记录访视、有效管理时间、解决家长担忧、识别健康问题以及识别高风险情况方面最有帮助。RBR作为管理或转诊已识别健康问题的工具被认为最没有帮助。研究第二部分:共审核了176名儿童的1378次健康婴儿访视记录。与18名未使用RBR的FP/GP相比,使用RBR的20名FP/GP提供的健康婴儿护理在统计学上更有可能包括喂养类型记录(p = 0.023)、安全问题讨论(p < 0.001)、发育评估(p = 0.001)以及整体全面性(p < 0.001)。与未使用者相比,使用RBR的人提供的健康婴儿护理在生长测量记录(p = 0.097)或体格检查记录(p = 0.828)方面并没有更高的可能性。

结论

在这些环境中,FP/GP广泛使用RBR。RBR用户发现它在许多方面都有帮助,并且在健康婴儿护理的许多方面记录率一直很高。Rourke婴儿记录已成为初级保健儿科提供者在儿科预防医学知识转化和健康监测方面事实上的金标准临床实践工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ea/2688494/e373292d7ca5/1471-2296-10-28-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ea/2688494/e373292d7ca5/1471-2296-10-28-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ea/2688494/e373292d7ca5/1471-2296-10-28-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Rourke Baby Record Infant/Child Maintenance Guide: do doctors use it, do they find it useful, and does using it improve their well-baby visit records?《洛克婴儿记录婴幼儿养护指南》:医生会使用它吗?他们觉得它有用吗?使用它是否能改善他们的健康婴儿检查记录?
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Apr 30;10:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-28.
2
Rourke Baby Record 2014: Evidence-based tool for the health of infants and children from birth to age 5.《2014年Rourke婴儿记录:从出生到5岁婴幼儿健康的循证工具》
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Nov;61(11):949-55.
3
Evidence-based well-baby care. Part 2: Education and advice section of the next generation of the Rourke Baby Record.循证婴幼儿保健。第2部分:《鲁尔克婴儿记录》下一代的教育与建议板块。
Can Fam Physician. 1998 Mar;44:568-72.
4
Evidence-based well-baby care. Part 1: Overview of the next generation of the Rourke Baby Record.循证健康婴儿护理。第1部分:下一代鲁尔克婴儿记录概述。
Can Fam Physician. 1998 Mar;44:558-67.
5
Update on well-baby and well-child care from 0 to 5 years: What's new in the Rourke Baby Record?0 至 5 岁婴幼儿健康护理最新进展:Rourke 婴儿记录中有哪些新内容?
Can Fam Physician. 2010 Dec;56(12):1285-90.
6
Getting it right from birth to kindergarten: what's new in the Rourke Baby Record?从出生到幼儿园:Rourke 婴儿记录有哪些新变化?
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Apr;59(4):355-9.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
2020 edition of the Rourke Baby Record: What is new in preventive care of children up to 5 years of age?2020 版《Rourke 婴儿记录》:5 岁以下儿童预防保健有哪些新内容?
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Jul;67(7):488-498. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6707488.
9
Well-baby care in the new millennium. Evidence-based care and the new Rourke Baby Record.新千年的健康婴儿护理。循证护理与新的Rourke婴儿记录。
Can Fam Physician. 1998 Mar;44:470-1, 478-9.
10
The 2020 Rourke Baby Record release: A time for reflection and looking forward.2020年《洛克婴儿记录》发布:反思与展望之时。
Paediatr Child Health. 2021 Mar 23;26(5):283-286. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxaa135. eCollection 2021 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing an Early Detection Program for Autism Spectrum Disorders in the Polish Primary Healthcare Setting-Possible Obstacles and Experiences from Online ASD Screening.在波兰初级卫生保健环境中实施自闭症谱系障碍早期检测计划——在线自闭症谱系障碍筛查的可能障碍与经验
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 16;14(4):388. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040388.
2
Continuing Medical Education Improves Physician Communication Skills and Increases Likelihood of Pediatric Vaccination: Findings from the Pediatric Influenza Vaccination Optimization Trial (PIVOT)-II.继续医学教育可提高医生的沟通技巧并增加儿童接种疫苗的可能性:来自儿童流感疫苗优化试验(PIVOT-II)的结果。
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;11(1):17. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010017.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Well baby visits: screening and health promotion.婴幼儿访视:筛查和健康促进。
Can Fam Physician. 1985 May;31:997-1002.
2
Developing the rourke baby record.开发鲁尔克婴儿记录。
Paediatr Child Health. 1998 Sep;3(5):315. doi: 10.1093/pch/3.5.315.
3
How do family physicians provide anticipatory guidance during well-child visits?家庭医生在儿童健康检查期间如何提供预期指导?
Knowledge mobilization for primary care: Lessons learned from 40 years of the Rourke Baby Record.
基层医疗中的知识传播:从《Rourke婴儿记录》40年历程中汲取的经验教训。
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Oct;68(10):721-725. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6810721.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Oct;68(10):729-735. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6810729.
5
Scope of Practice and Principles of Care of Naturopathic Medicine in North America: A Commentary.北美自然疗法医学的执业范围与护理原则:一篇评论
Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;9(1):8. doi: 10.3390/children9010008.
6
The 2020 Rourke Baby Record release: A time for reflection and looking forward.2020年《洛克婴儿记录》发布:反思与展望之时。
Paediatr Child Health. 2021 Mar 23;26(5):283-286. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxaa135. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Whole milk compared with reduced-fat milk and childhood overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全脂牛奶与低脂牛奶和儿童超重的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Feb 1;111(2):266-279. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz276.
8
The quality of preventive care for pre-school aged children in Australian general practice.澳大利亚普通实践中对学龄前儿童预防保健的质量。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 6;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1455-x.
9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Mar;65(3):e99-e109.
10
Rourke Baby Record 2017: Clinical update for preventive care of children up to 5 years of age.2017 年 Rourke 婴儿记录:5 岁以下儿童预防保健临床更新。
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Mar;65(3):183-191.
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005 Sep-Oct;18(5):440-4. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.5.440.
4
Well-child care: effectiveness of current recommendations.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2002 May;41(4):211-7. doi: 10.1177/000992280204100403.
5
Rourke Baby Record 2000. Collaboration in action.《2000年洛克婴儿记录》。实际合作。
Can Fam Physician. 2001 Feb;47:333-4.
6
Use of a structured encounter form to improve well-child care documentation.使用结构化问诊表来改善儿童健康保健记录。
Arch Fam Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;7(5):480-3. doi: 10.1001/archfami.7.5.480.
7
Evidence-based well-baby care. Part 2: Education and advice section of the next generation of the Rourke Baby Record.循证婴幼儿保健。第2部分:《鲁尔克婴儿记录》下一代的教育与建议板块。
Can Fam Physician. 1998 Mar;44:568-72.
8
Evidence-based well-baby care. Part 1: Overview of the next generation of the Rourke Baby Record.循证健康婴儿护理。第1部分:下一代鲁尔克婴儿记录概述。
Can Fam Physician. 1998 Mar;44:558-67.
9
Effects of structured encounter forms on pediatric house staff knowledge, parent satisfaction, and quality of care. A randomized, controlled trial.结构化会诊表格对儿科住院医师知识、家长满意度及护理质量的影响。一项随机对照试验。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Sep;150(9):975-80. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170340089017.
10
Well-baby assessment revisited. 1994 update of the Rourke Baby Record flow charts.重温健康婴儿评估。《洛克婴儿记录流程图》1994年更新版。
Can Fam Physician. 1994 Oct;40:1796-8, 1801-3.