• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培训医师进行共同决策——谁能被培训以及能取得什么效果?

Training physicians in shared decision-making-who can be reached and what is achieved?

机构信息

University of Heidelberg, Department of Psychosomatic and General Internal Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct;77(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.019. Epub 2009 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.019
PMID:19403258
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report on experiences with a general shared decision-making (SDM) physician training program offered to physicians throughout Germany.

METHODS

This study enrolled 150 physicians in an 8-h SDM training program. Physicians were assessed with standardized instruments before and after training. Main variables of interest were physician professional attributes, personality characteristics, attitudes, measures of training success (quality rating, knowledge, competency ratings), and variables associated with training success.

RESULTS

The SDM training obtained positive quality ratings, led to an amelioration in an objective SDM knowledge test (p<.001), and highly improved physicians' confidence in their SDM competencies (p<0.001). It attracted experienced, middle-aged (45 years), male and female (46%) physicians, mostly office-based (2/3) general practitioners and internists (2/3). Most physicians (94%) reported positive attitudes towards SDM. They were securely attached (63%) with predominant social career choice motives (46%). Physicians with personality characteristics clashing with the SDM concept benefited mostly from the training.

CONCLUSION

A voluntary SDM training program is attractive to practicing physicians and effective in increasing SDM-related confidence and knowledge.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Even physicians who are highly motivated to use SDM can improve their skills and benefit from SDM training. The dissemination of SDM training programs should be encouraged.

摘要

目的

报告一项针对德国各地医生开展的通用共享决策(SDM)医师培训计划的经验。

方法

本研究招募了 150 名参加 8 小时 SDM 培训计划的医生。培训前后,医生均采用标准化工具进行评估。主要关注变量包括医生的专业属性、人格特征、态度、培训成功衡量标准(质量评分、知识、能力评分)以及与培训成功相关的变量。

结果

SDM 培训获得了积极的质量评分,导致客观 SDM 知识测试(p<.001)得到改善,并显著提高了医生对 SDM 能力的信心(p<0.001)。它吸引了经验丰富、中年(45 岁)、男性和女性(46%)医生,主要是办公室(2/3)的全科医生和内科医生(2/3)。大多数医生(94%)对 SDM 持积极态度。他们是安全依恋(63%),具有主要的社会职业选择动机(46%)。与 SDM 理念相冲突的人格特征的医生从培训中获益最多。

结论

一项自愿的 SDM 培训计划对执业医生具有吸引力,并能有效提高与 SDM 相关的信心和知识。

实践意义

即使是非常有动机使用 SDM 的医生也可以提高他们的技能,并从 SDM 培训中受益。应鼓励推广 SDM 培训计划。

相似文献

1
Training physicians in shared decision-making-who can be reached and what is achieved?培训医师进行共同决策——谁能被培训以及能取得什么效果?
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct;77(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.019. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
2
A shared decision-making communication training program for physicians treating fibromyalgia patients: effects of a randomized controlled trial.一项针对治疗纤维肌痛患者的医生的共同决策沟通培训项目:一项随机对照试验的效果
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Jan;64(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.05.009.
3
Involving patients in decision making and communicating risk: a longitudinal evaluation of doctors' attitudes and confidence during a randomized trial.让患者参与决策并告知风险:一项关于医生在随机试验期间态度和信心的纵向评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 Aug;10(3):431-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00502.x.
4
Development of PRIDe: a tool to assess physicians' preference of role in clinical decision making.PRIDe 工具的开发:评估医生在临床决策中角色偏好的工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
5
Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire--physician version (SDM-Q-Doc).共享决策问卷-医师版(SDM-Q-Doc)的制定和心理测量特性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
6
[Shared decision making. The perspective of practicing physicians].[共同决策。执业医师的观点]
Med Klin (Munich). 2004 Aug 15;99(8):435-40. doi: 10.1007/s00063-004-1066-x.
7
[Shared decision making].[共同决策]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Oct 29;129(44):2343-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-835265.
8
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
9
Long-term effects of a shared decision-making intervention on physician-patient interaction and outcome in fibromyalgia. A qualitative and quantitative 1 year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.共同决策干预对纤维肌痛患者医患互动及结局的长期影响:一项随机对照试验的定性与定量1年随访
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):357-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
10
[Shared decision-making with hypertensive patients. Results of an implementation in Germany].[与高血压患者共同决策。在德国的实施结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006 Nov 17;131(46):2592-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-956254.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a shared decision-making implementation programme on patient-centred communication in oncology-Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.共享决策实施计划对肿瘤患者中心沟通的影响——一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14030. doi: 10.1111/hex.14030.
2
Effects of online continuing medical education on perspectives of shared decision-making among Chinese endocrinologists.在线继续医学教育对中国内分泌科医生共同决策观念的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04838-5.
3
Talking, not training, increased the accuracy of physicians' diagnosis of their patients' preferences for colon cancer screening.
交流而非培训提高了医生诊断其患者对结肠癌筛查偏好的准确性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Feb;119:108047. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108047. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
Evaluating the Impact of a Training Program in Shared Decision-Making for Neurologists Treating People with Migraine.评估针对治疗偏头痛患者的神经科医生的共同决策培训项目的影响。
Neurol Ther. 2023 Aug;12(4):1319-1334. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00495-4. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
5
Establishing the Competency Development and Talent Cultivation Strategies for Physician-Patient Shared Decision-Making Competency Based on the IAA-NRM Approach.基于IAA-NRM方法建立医患共同决策能力的能力发展与人才培养策略
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 23;10(10):1844. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101844.
6
Evaluation of a national programme to improve shared decision-making skills among junior medical doctors in Denmark: a mixed methods study of satisfaction, usefulness, and dissemination of learning outcomes in clinical practice.评价丹麦一项旨在提高初级医生共同决策技能的国家计划:一项混合方法研究,评估满意度、有用性以及学习成果在临床实践中的传播。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07639-6.
7
LUPUS-BEST-treat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus: study protocol for a three-armed cluster-randomised trial.狼疮最佳靶向治疗系统性红斑狼疮:一项三臂群组随机试验的研究方案。
Lupus Sci Med. 2021 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000516.
8
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the IcanSDM measure - a cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals.《德国版 IcanSDM 测量量表的翻译与心理计量学评估——一项针对医疗保健专业人员的横断面研究》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06430-3.
9
Teaching clinicians shared decision making and risk communication online: an evaluation study.在线教授临床医生共同决策和风险沟通:一项评估研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):253. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111521. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
10
Do Physicians' Attitudes towards Patient-Centered Communication Promote Physicians' Intention and Behavior of Involving Patients in Medical Decisions?医生对以患者为中心的沟通的态度是否能促进医生参与患者医疗决策的意愿和行为?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 2;17(17):6393. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176393.