Falagas Matthew E, Kastoris Antonia C, Karageorgopoulos Drosos E, Rafailidis Petros I
Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), Athens, Greece.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Aug;34(2):111-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
The treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacterial infections constitutes a challenge in an era of few new antibiotic choices. This mandates the re-evaluation of already existing antibiotics such as fosfomycin. We systematically reviewed the literature to assess the clinical and microbiological effectiveness of fosfomycin in the treatment of these infections by searching PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases. In 23 microbiological studies identified, 1859 MDR non-fermenting Gram-negative bacterial isolates were examined. The susceptibility rate to fosfomycin of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates was >or=90% and 50-90% in 7/19 and 4/19 relevant studies, respectively. Cumulatively, 511/1693 (30.2%) MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin. Serotype O12 isolates exhibited greater susceptibility. Only 3/85 (3.5%) MDR Acinetobacter baumannii and 0/31 MDR Burkholderia spp. isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin. Variable criteria of susceptibility were used in the included studies. Fosfomycin was synergistic in combination with a beta-lactam, aminoglycoside or ciprofloxacin in 46/86 (53.5%) MDR P. aeruginosa isolates. One animal study found a good therapeutic effect of the combination fosfomycin/gentamicin against MDR P. aeruginosa endocarditis. In six clinical studies, 33 patients with MDR P. aeruginosa infections (mainly pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis) received fosfomycin (25/33 in combination with other antibiotics); 91% of the patients clinically improved. In conclusion, fosfomycin could have a role as a therapeutic option against MDR P. aeruginosa infections. Further research is needed to clarify the potential utility of this agent.
在几乎没有新抗生素可供选择的时代,治疗多重耐药(MDR)、广泛耐药或全耐药非发酵革兰氏阴性菌感染是一项挑战。这就要求重新评估已有的抗生素,如磷霉素。我们通过检索PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆数据库,系统地回顾了文献,以评估磷霉素治疗这些感染的临床和微生物学有效性。在确定的23项微生物学研究中,共检测了1859株MDR非发酵革兰氏阴性菌分离株。在7/19和4/19项相关研究中,MDR铜绿假单胞菌分离株对磷霉素的敏感率分别≥90%和50 - 90%。累计来看,511/1693(30.2%)的MDR铜绿假单胞菌分离株对磷霉素敏感。O12血清型分离株表现出更高的敏感性。只有3/85(3.5%)的MDR鲍曼不动杆菌和0/31的MDR伯克霍尔德菌属分离株对磷霉素敏感。纳入研究中使用了不同的敏感性标准。在46/86(53.5%)的MDR铜绿假单胞菌分离株中,磷霉素与β-内酰胺类、氨基糖苷类或环丙沙星联合使用具有协同作用。一项动物研究发现,磷霉素/庆大霉素联合用药对MDR铜绿假单胞菌心内膜炎有良好的治疗效果。在6项临床研究中,33例MDR铜绿假单胞菌感染患者(主要是囊性纤维化肺部加重)接受了磷霉素治疗(25/33联合其他抗生素);91%的患者临床症状改善。总之,磷霉素可能作为治疗MDR铜绿假单胞菌感染的一种治疗选择。需要进一步研究以阐明该药物的潜在用途。