• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替代标志物可预测多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者的血管生成潜力和生存期。

Surrogate markers predict angiogenic potential and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

作者信息

Greenfield Jeffrey P, Jin David K, Young Lauren M, Christos Paul J, Abrey Lauren, Rafii Shahin, Gutin Philip H

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2009 May;64(5):819-26; discussion 826-7. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000343742.06625.DB.

DOI:10.1227/01.NEU.0000343742.06625.DB
PMID:19404145
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The neovascularization of malignant brain tumors is a poorly understood phenomenon. Radiographic and histological evidence of increased vascularity correlate with clinical grade of gliomas. However, a quantitative noninvasive assay to assess glioma vascularity and associated clinical aggressiveness has not been developed. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells are unique vascular precursors recruited from the bone marrow through the circulation to form new tumor blood vessels. These cells were measured in patients undergoing surgery for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). We hypothesized that this might reflect the extent of tumor vascularity, predict prognosis, or be useful as an assay to assess response to antiangiogenesis therapies. In addition, we report on a novel in vitro assay to assess the proangiogenic activity within the plasma samples obtained from glioma patients.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with various-grade gliomas had peripheral venous blood collected at the time of surgery and at subsequent visits during the follow-up period. The blood was separated into plasma and cellular fractions. The plasma was utilized in a human umbilical vein endothelial cell-based angiogenic assay. The cellular fraction containing endothelial progenitor cells was isolated, and specific cellular phenotypes were immunologically separated and counted using flow cytometry. Pathological samples were reviewed at the time of initial resection, and each patient's clinical course was monitored until the time of manuscript submission.

RESULTS

Plasma derived from peripheral blood of patients with GBM scored significantly higher on the functional angiogenic scale compared with plasma derived from patients with low-grade gliomas and from controls. In addition, all patients with GBM had measurable numbers of bone marrow-derived endothelial precursor cells coexpressing CD133 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in their peripheral circulation at the time of tumor resection. These cells range from less than 0.1% to 1.6% of the entire circulating mononuclear white blood cell population, or approximately 200,000 cells in some patients. A statistically significant relationship was observed between the percentage of endothelial progenitor cells in the peripheral blood at the time of initial GBM resection and survival.

CONCLUSION

These studies suggest that plasma and circulating CD133+ vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2+ proangiogenic cells are present in the peripheral blood of patients with glioma and can be used as a surrogate biomarker to measure tumor angiogenicity. These cells can be measured at the time of diagnosis and monitored in the postoperative period. These assays can be used to predict tumor aggressiveness. Also promising is their potential to identify patients with increased angiogenic activity who might respond maximally to antiangiogenesis therapies or to assess tumor response in patients using those therapies as the use of these adjuvant molecular modalities becomes more prevalent in neuro-oncology.

摘要

目的

恶性脑肿瘤的新生血管形成是一个尚未被充分理解的现象。影像学和组织学上血管增多的证据与胶质瘤的临床分级相关。然而,尚未开发出一种定量的非侵入性检测方法来评估胶质瘤血管生成及相关的临床侵袭性。循环内皮祖细胞是从骨髓中募集并通过循环形成新的肿瘤血管的独特血管前体细胞。对多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)手术患者的这些细胞进行了检测。我们推测这可能反映肿瘤血管生成的程度、预测预后,或作为评估抗血管生成治疗反应的一种检测方法。此外,我们报告了一种新的体外检测方法,用于评估从胶质瘤患者获得的血浆样本中的促血管生成活性。

方法

56例不同分级的胶质瘤患者在手术时及随访期间的后续就诊时采集外周静脉血。血液被分离成血浆和细胞部分。血浆用于基于人脐静脉内皮细胞的血管生成检测。分离出含有内皮祖细胞的细胞部分,使用流式细胞术对特定细胞表型进行免疫分离和计数。在初次切除时复查病理样本,并监测每位患者的临床病程直至稿件提交时。

结果

与低级别胶质瘤患者和对照组患者的血浆相比,GBM患者外周血来源的血浆在功能性血管生成量表上的得分显著更高。此外,所有GBM患者在肿瘤切除时外周循环中均有可测量数量的共表达CD133和血管内皮生长因子受体2的骨髓来源的内皮祖细胞。这些细胞占整个循环单核白细胞群体的比例从不到0.1%到1.6%不等,在一些患者中约为200,000个细胞。在初次GBM切除时外周血中内皮祖细胞的百分比与生存率之间观察到统计学上的显著关系。

结论

这些研究表明,胶质瘤患者外周血中存在血浆和循环中的CD133 +血管内皮生长因子受体2 +促血管生成细胞,可作为测量肿瘤血管生成的替代生物标志物。这些细胞可以在诊断时进行检测,并在术后进行监测。这些检测方法可用于预测肿瘤的侵袭性。同样有前景的是,随着这些辅助分子模式在神经肿瘤学中的应用越来越普遍,它们有可能识别出血管生成活性增加、可能对抗血管生成治疗反应最大的患者,或评估使用这些治疗方法的患者的肿瘤反应。

相似文献

1
Surrogate markers predict angiogenic potential and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.替代标志物可预测多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者的血管生成潜力和生存期。
Neurosurgery. 2009 May;64(5):819-26; discussion 826-7. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000343742.06625.DB.
2
Circulating endothelial progenitor cells in malignant gliomas.恶性脑胶质瘤中的循环内皮祖细胞。
J Neurosurg. 2010 Jan;112(1):43-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.JNS081074.
3
Identification and clinical significance of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in human non-small cell lung cancer.人非小细胞肺癌中循环内皮祖细胞的鉴定及其临床意义
Cancer Res. 2006 Jul 15;66(14):7341-7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4654.
4
Circulating endothelial progenitor cells correlate to stage in patients with invasive breast cancer.循环内皮祖细胞与浸润性乳腺癌患者的分期相关。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Jan;107(1):133-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9519-6. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
5
Endothelial precursor cells promote angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma.内皮祖细胞促进肝癌血管生成。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep 21;18(35):4925-33. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4925.
6
Expression of the stem cell marker CD133 in recurrent glioblastoma and its value for prognosis.干细胞标志物 CD133 在复发性脑胶质瘤中的表达及其对预后的价值。
Cancer. 2011 Jan 1;117(1):162-74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25581. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
7
A distinct subpopulation within CD133 positive brain tumor cells shares characteristics with endothelial progenitor cells.CD133 阳性脑肿瘤细胞中的一个独特亚群具有与内皮祖细胞相似的特征。
Cancer Lett. 2012 Nov 28;324(2):221-30. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.05.026. Epub 2012 May 28.
8
Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and depression: a possible novel link between heart and soul.循环内皮祖细胞与抑郁症:心灵与心脏之间可能存在的新联系。
Mol Psychiatry. 2009 May;14(5):523-31. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002138. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
9
The evaluation of circulating endothelial progenitor cells and related angiogenic markers as prognostic factors in soft-tissue tumors.循环内皮祖细胞及其相关血管生成标志物评估在软组织肿瘤中的预后价值。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;44(4):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.083. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
Stem cell-like human endothelial progenitors show enhanced colony-forming capacity after brief sevoflurane exposure: preconditioning of angiogenic cells by volatile anesthetics.短暂暴露于七氟醚后,干细胞样人内皮祖细胞显示出增强的集落形成能力:挥发性麻醉剂对血管生成细胞的预处理。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Oct;109(4):1117-26. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b5a277.

引用本文的文献

1
Protrusion-Derived Extracellular Vesicles (PD-EVs) and Their Diverse Origins: Key Players in Cellular Communication, Cancer Progression, and T Cell Modulation.突起衍生的细胞外囊泡(PD-EVs)及其多样起源:细胞通讯、癌症进展和T细胞调节中的关键参与者
Biol Cell. 2025 Jun;117(6):e70018. doi: 10.1111/boc.70018.
2
Can CD133 Be Regarded as a Prognostic Biomarker in Oncology: Pros and Cons.CD133 能否作为肿瘤学中的预后生物标志物:利弊分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 12;24(24):17398. doi: 10.3390/ijms242417398.
3
Prognostic value of circulating endothelial cells in glioblastoma patients: a pilot study.
胶质母细胞瘤患者循环内皮细胞的预后价值:一项初步研究。
Future Sci OA. 2022 May 24;8(5):FSO796. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2022-0008. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Flow cytometric analysis of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells in pediatric solid tumors: prognostic impact on treatment response and survival.流式细胞术分析儿科实体瘤患者循环内皮细胞和内皮祖细胞:对治疗反应和生存预后的影响。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021 Mar;70(3):755-761. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02719-0. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
5
Blood Biomarkers of Glioma in Response Assessment Including Pseudoprogression and Other Treatment Effects: A Systematic Review.胶质瘤反应评估中的血液生物标志物,包括假性进展和其他治疗效果:一项系统综述
Front Oncol. 2020 Aug 14;10:1191. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01191. eCollection 2020.
6
Circulating angiogenic cells in glioblastoma: toward defining crucial functional differences in CAC-induced neoplastic versus reactive neovascularization.胶质母细胞瘤中的循环血管生成细胞:旨在明确循环血管生成细胞诱导的肿瘤性与反应性新生血管形成的关键功能差异
Neurooncol Adv. 2020 Apr 1;2(1):vdaa040. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa040. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
7
Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration.胶质瘤和急性心肌梗死患者循环中的促血管生成细胞与蛋白质:肿瘤形成与组织再生中血管生成的差异
J Oncol. 2019 Jul 21;2019:3560830. doi: 10.1155/2019/3560830. eCollection 2019.
8
A proangiogenic signaling axis in myeloid cells promotes malignant progression of glioma.髓系细胞中的促血管生成信号轴促进胶质瘤的恶性进展。
J Clin Invest. 2017 May 1;127(5):1826-1838. doi: 10.1172/JCI86443. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
Malignant Transformation in Glioma Steered by an Angiogenic Switch: Defining a Role for Bone Marrow-Derived Cells.血管生成转换引导的胶质瘤恶性转化:确定骨髓来源细胞的作用
Cureus. 2016 Jan 27;8(1):e471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.471.
10
Liquid biopsies in patients with diffuse glioma.弥漫性胶质瘤患者的液体活检
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Jun;129(6):849-65. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1399-y. Epub 2015 Feb 27.