Hongo Michio, Ilharreborde Brice, Gay Ralph E, Zhao Chunfeng, Zhao Kristin D, Berglund Lawrence J, Zobitz Mark, An Kai-Nan
Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18(8):1213-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0999-4. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
The technology used in surgery for spinal deformity has progressed rapidly in recent years. Commonly used fixation techniques may include monofilament wires, sublaminar wires and cables, and pedicle screws. Unfortunately, neurological complications can occur with all of these, compromising the patients' health and quality of life. Recently, an alternative fixation technique using a metal clamp and polyester belt was developed to replace hooks and sublaminar wiring in scoliosis surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the pull-out strength of this new construct with sublaminar wiring, laminar hooks and pedicle screws. Forty thoracic vertebrae from five fresh frozen human thoracic spines (T5-12) were divided into five groups (8 per group), such that BMD values, pedicle diameter, and vertebral levels were equally distributed. They were then potted in polymethylmethacrylate and anchored with metal screws and polyethylene bands. One of five fixation methods was applied to the right side of the vertebra in each group: Pedicle screw, sublaminar belt with clamp, figure-8 belt with clamp, sublaminar wire, or laminar hook. Pull-out strength was then assessed using a custom jig in a servohydraulic tester. The mean failure load of the pedicle screw group was significantly larger than that of the figure-8 clamp (P = 0.001), sublaminar belt (0.0172), and sublaminar wire groups (P = 0.04) with no significant difference in pull-out strength between the latter three constructs. The most common mode of failure was the fracture of the pedicle. BMD was significantly correlated with failure load only in the figure-8 clamp and pedicle screw constructs. Only the pedicle screw had a statistically significant higher failure load than the sublaminar clamp. The sublaminar method of applying the belt and clamp device was superior to the figure-8 method. The sublaminar belt and clamp construct compared favorably to the traditional methods of sublaminar wires and laminar hooks, and should be considered as an alternative fixation device in the thoracic spine.
近年来,脊柱畸形手术中使用的技术发展迅速。常用的固定技术可能包括单丝钢丝、椎板下钢丝和缆线以及椎弓根螺钉。不幸的是,所有这些技术都可能出现神经并发症,从而损害患者的健康和生活质量。最近,一种使用金属夹和聚酯带的替代固定技术被开发出来,以取代脊柱侧弯手术中的钩子和椎板下钢丝。本研究的目的是比较这种新结构与椎板下钢丝、椎板钩和椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度。从五个新鲜冷冻的人体胸椎(T5 - 12)中取出的40个胸椎椎体被分为五组(每组8个),以使骨密度值、椎弓根直径和椎体节段均匀分布。然后将它们植入聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯中,并用金属螺钉和聚乙烯带固定。每组中对椎体右侧应用五种固定方法之一:椎弓根螺钉、带夹的椎板下带、带夹的8字形带、椎板下钢丝或椎板钩。然后使用伺服液压试验机中的定制夹具评估拔出强度。椎弓根螺钉组的平均失效载荷显著大于8字形夹(P = 0.001)、椎板下带组(P = 0.0172)和椎板下钢丝组(P = 0.04),后三种结构之间的拔出强度无显著差异。最常见的失效模式是椎弓根骨折。仅在8字形夹和椎弓根螺钉结构中,骨密度与失效载荷显著相关。只有椎弓根螺钉的失效载荷在统计学上显著高于椎板下夹。应用带夹装置的椎板下方法优于8字形方法。与传统的椎板下钢丝和椎板钩方法相比,椎板下带和夹结构具有优势,应被视为胸椎的一种替代固定装置。