Hendrickx Kristin, De Winter Benedicte, Tjalma Wiebren, Avonts Drik, Peeraer Griet, Wyndaele Jean-Jacques
University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):e139-47. doi: 10.1080/01421590802516715.
For fifth-year's undergraduates of the medical school, a project with simulated patients (Intimate Examination Associates, IEA) was implemented in 2002 at the University of Antwerp. In this project, students from the new curriculum (NC) learned uro-genital, rectal, gynaecological and breast examination in healthy, trained volunteers and received feedback focused on personal attitude, technical and communication skills. Former curriculum (FC) students however trained these skills only during internship in the sixth year after a single training on manikins.
This study assessed the effect of learning intimate examinations with IEA's by comparing students from FC and NC on four different outcome parameters.
Three groups were compared: FC after internships without IEA training, NC after internships with IEA training and fifth year NC immediately after the IEA training. Four assessment instruments: an OSCE using checklists and global rating scales to assess the technical skills, a score list on students attitudes and performance filled in by the IEA's, a student questionnaire on self-assessed competence and a questionnaire on the frequency of performing intimate skills during internships.
Both NC groups scored globally better in the OSCE (significance for male examination). Sub-scores for 'completeness' and 'systematic' approach was significantly higher in both NC groups for male and female examinations. NC students reported better self-assessed competence and performance concerning gynaecological and urological clinical and communication skills during internship. The best results were obtained after IEA training and internship was done for the four outcomes. IEA's are influenced by the 'experienced' students after internship: FC and NC after internship both scored better than the fifth year NC who only received the IEA training so far.
Learning intimate examinations with IEA's has a positive effect on the performance of medical students. This beneficial effect is on its turn reinforced during internships.
2002年,安特卫普大学为医学院五年级本科生实施了一个模拟患者项目(亲密检查伙伴,IEA)。在这个项目中,新课程(NC)的学生在健康、经过培训的志愿者身上学习泌尿生殖、直肠、妇科和乳房检查,并收到侧重于个人态度、技术和沟通技巧的反馈。然而,旧课程(FC)的学生仅在第六年实习期间通过对人体模型的单次培训来训练这些技能。
本研究通过比较FC组和NC组学生在四个不同结果参数上的表现,评估使用IEA进行亲密检查学习的效果。
比较三组:未接受IEA培训的实习后的FC组、接受IEA培训的实习后的NC组和IEA培训后立即进行的五年级NC组。四种评估工具:使用清单和整体评分量表评估技术技能的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)、IEA填写的学生态度和表现评分表、学生自我评估能力问卷以及实习期间进行亲密技能频率的问卷。
两个NC组在OSCE中的总体得分更高(男性检查有显著性差异)。在男性和女性检查中,两个NC组在“完整性”和“系统性”方法的子得分显著更高。NC组学生报告在实习期间对妇科和泌尿科临床及沟通技能的自我评估能力和表现更好。在进行了IEA培训和实习后,四个结果均取得了最佳成绩。实习后,IEA受到“有经验”学生的影响:实习后的FC组和NC组得分均高于仅接受了IEA培训的五年级NC组。
使用IEA进行亲密检查学习对医学生的表现有积极影响。这种有益效果在实习期间会进一步增强。