• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[胎儿心率对听觉刺激的反应模式]

[Fetal heart rate patterns in response to acoustic stimulation].

作者信息

Iida M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo.

出版信息

Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991 Nov;43(11):1561-7.

PMID:1940554
Abstract

Fetal heart rate response to fetal acoustic stimulation (FAST) during the antepartum period after 25 weeks of gestational age was studied in 157 cases of normal pregnancy, 22 cases of fetal distress, 12 cases of SFD, 10 cases of fetal malformation, 9 cases of placental dysfunction, 4 cases of oligohydramnios, 12 cases of toxemia of pregnancy, and 15 cases of SLE. Five different types of response were observed: Type I through type V. 1. FAST was available to evaluate fetal well-being from 27 weeks of gestational age, although a nonstress test (NST) has been used after 31 weeks of gestational age. 2. Type IV was observed frequently in the case of coiling of the umbilical cord. 3. In acute fetal distress abnormality was detected by NST prior to FAST, but in latent fetal distress abnormality was detected by FAST prior to NST. 4. Cases classified as FAST types III and IV, which remained unchanged or deteriorated to III, IV or V were almost all characterized by poor fetal outcome.

摘要

对157例正常妊娠、22例胎儿窘迫、12例胎儿生长受限、10例胎儿畸形、9例胎盘功能障碍、4例羊水过少、12例妊娠中毒症和15例系统性红斑狼疮患者,研究了孕25周后产前期间胎儿心率对胎儿声刺激(FAST)的反应。观察到五种不同类型的反应:I型至V型。1. 尽管在孕31周后使用了无应激试验(NST),但从孕27周起FAST即可用于评估胎儿健康状况。2. 在脐带缠绕的情况下,IV型反应较为常见。3. 在急性胎儿窘迫中,NST在FAST之前检测到异常,但在潜在胎儿窘迫中,FAST在NST之前检测到异常。4. 分类为FAST III型和IV型且保持不变或恶化为III型、IV型或V型的病例几乎均以不良胎儿结局为特征。

相似文献

1
[Fetal heart rate patterns in response to acoustic stimulation].[胎儿心率对听觉刺激的反应模式]
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991 Nov;43(11):1561-7.
2
Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.用于快速产前评估胎儿健康状况的短程胎儿声刺激试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Apr;84(4):520-4.
3
[Evaluation of fetal well-being by vibro-acoustic stimulation test].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1994 Jun;29(6):322-4, 380.
4
Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.改良声刺激检测无应激试验假无反应的临床研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Aug;284(2):271-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1621-z. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
5
[Clinical evaluation of antepartum vibratory acoustic stimulation test].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1991 Mar;26(2):71-4, 123.
6
Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
J Reprod Med. 1988 Apr;33(4):365-8.
7
[Clinical analysis of continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring for preterm small for gestational age during labor].[产时连续电子胎心监护用于早产小于胎龄儿的临床分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Feb;40(2):106-8.
8
Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial.手法刺激试验与无应激试验的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Dec;89(12):1999-2002.
9
[Clinical value of short-term variation of fetal heart rate and its relationship with prenatal outcome].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Apr;42(4):233-5.
10
Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
J Reprod Med. 1988 Feb;33(2):217-8.