Bourgès-Abella Nathalie H, Reynolds Brice S, Geffré Anne, Braun Jean-Pierre, Trumel Catherine
Department of Clinical Sciences, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 Chemin des Capelles, 31076 Toulouse Cedex 03, France.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009 May;21(3):364-8. doi: 10.1177/104063870902100311.
The aim of the current study was to compare feline hematologic variables in blood collected in microcapillary tubes (20 microl) and conventional blood tubes with the Medonic CA620/530 Vet in-house hematologic analyzer. A comparison of results obtained in 60 cats presented at the clinics of the veterinary school showed that the correlations between the 2 methods were 0.97 for white blood cell, 0.95 for red blood cell, and 0.93 for platelet counts; 0.92 for hemoglobin concentration; and 0.99 for mean corpuscular volume. No clinically relevant differences between the 2 blood sampling techniques were observed for any variable, which suggests that both techniques are interchangeable in cats. Moreover, microcapillary tubes would allow easier repeated sampling in the same cat and would likely be useful in other small species.
本研究的目的是使用梅敦力CA620/530 Vet室内血液分析仪，比较用微量毛细管（20微升）和传统采血管采集的猫血液中的血液学变量。对兽医学院诊所收治的60只猫的检测结果进行比较，结果显示，两种方法之间的相关性为：白细胞计数0.97、红细胞计数0.95、血小板计数0.93、血红蛋白浓度0.92、平均红细胞体积0.99。对于任何变量，两种采血技术均未观察到临床相关差异，这表明两种技术在猫身上可互换使用。此外，微量毛细管便于在同一只猫身上重复采样，可能对其他小型物种也有用。
