Chazot Charles, Terrat Jean Claude, Dumoulin Alexandre, Ang Kim-Seng, Gassia Jean Paul, Chedid Khalil, Maurice Francois, Canaud Bernard
Centre de Dialyse, Tassin la Demi-Lune, France.
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Feb;43(2):228-34. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K664. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
Darbepoetin alfa is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) used either intravenously or subcutaneously with no dose penalty; however, the direct switch from subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) to intravenous darbepoetin has barely been studied.
To establish the equivalence of a direct switch from subcutaneous rHuEPO to intravenous darbepoetin versus an indirect switch from subcutaneous rHuEPO to intravenous darbepoetin after 2 months of subcutaneous darbepoetin in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
In this open, randomized, 6-month, prospective study, patients with end-stage kidney disease who were on hemodialysis were randomized into 2 groups: direct switch from subcutaneous rHuEPO to intravenous darbepoetin (group 1) and indirect switch from subcutaneous rHuEPO to intravenous darbepoetin after 2 months of subcutaneous darbepoetin (group 2). A third, nonrandomized group (control), consisting of patients treated with intravenous rHuEPO who were switched to intravenous darbepoetin, was also studied to reflect possible variations of hemoglobin (Hb) levels due to change from one type of ESA to the other. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stable Hb levels at month 6. Secondary endpoints included Hb stability at month 3, dosage requirements for darbepoetin, and safety of the administration route.
Among 154 randomized patients, the percentages with stable Hb levels were equivalent in groups 1 and 2, respectively, at month 3 (86.0% vs 91.3%) and month 6 (82.1% vs 81.6%; difference -0.5 [90% CI -12.8 to 11.8]). Mean Hb levels between baseline and month 6 remained stable in both groups, with no variation in mean darbepoetin dose. Mean ferritin levels remained above 100 microg/L in the 3 groups during the whole study, and darbepoetin was well tolerated.
This study has shown equivalent efficacy on Hb stability without the need for dosage increase in patients switched directly from subcutaneous rHuEPO to intravenous darbepoetin.
达贝泊汀α是一种促红细胞生成素(ESA),可静脉或皮下使用,不存在剂量惩罚;然而,从皮下重组人促红细胞生成素(rHuEPO)直接转换为静脉注射达贝泊汀的情况几乎未被研究过。
在接受血液透析的患者中,确定从皮下rHuEPO直接转换为静脉注射达贝泊汀与在皮下使用达贝泊汀2个月后从皮下rHuEPO间接转换为静脉注射达贝泊汀的等效性。
在这项开放、随机、为期6个月的前瞻性研究中,将接受血液透析的终末期肾病患者随机分为2组:从皮下rHuEPO直接转换为静脉注射达贝泊汀(第1组)和在皮下使用达贝泊汀2个月后从皮下rHuEPO间接转换为静脉注射达贝泊汀(第2组)。还研究了第三组非随机分组(对照组),该组由接受静脉注射rHuEPO并转换为静脉注射达贝泊汀的患者组成,以反映由于从一种ESA转换为另一种ESA导致的血红蛋白(Hb)水平的可能变化。主要结局是第6个月时Hb水平稳定的患者比例。次要终点包括第3个月时的Hb稳定性、达贝泊汀的剂量需求以及给药途径的安全性。
在154例随机分组的患者中,第1组和第2组在第3个月(86.0%对91.3%)和第6个月(82.1%对81.6%;差异-0.5[90%CI-12.8至11.8])时Hb水平稳定的百分比相当。两组从基线到第6个月的平均Hb水平均保持稳定,达贝泊汀的平均剂量无变化。在整个研究期间,3组的平均铁蛋白水平均保持在100μg/L以上,达贝泊汀耐受性良好。
本研究表明,对于从皮下rHuEPO直接转换为静脉注射达贝泊汀的患者,在Hb稳定性方面具有等效疗效,且无需增加剂量。