Georges Philippe, Nisand David, Etienne Daniel, Mora Francis
Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Hotel Dieu Hospital APHP Paris 7, Denis Diderot University, UFR of Odontology, Paris, France.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009 Apr;29(2):201-11.
The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the effectiveness of the supraperiosteal envelope technique as performed by three surgeons with different amounts of professional experience during a 6-month observation period. Sixty-eight gingival recessions in 35 healthy patients were selected and included in clinical recordings. They were statistically evaluated at baseline and 6 months later. First, clinical parameters (attachment level, pocket depth, recession height, recession width, and gingival keratinized tissue height) were calibrated between the three operators. Then, single or multiple gingival recessions were selected and surgical techniques were standardized by the surgeons (A, B, C). The root coverage percentages obtained by the three operators were 81% for operator A, 85% for operator B, and 89% for operator C, for an average of 85%; initial recession height values were 2.5 mm (A), 4.3 mm (B), and 4.4 mm (C). The preliminary results of this trial showed the capacity of this surgical technique to provide favorable clinical benefits irrespective of the initial dimensions of recession-type defects and irrespective of the learning curve and experience of operators.
本临床研究的目的是比较三位具有不同专业经验的外科医生在6个月观察期内采用骨膜上覆盖技术的有效性。选取35例健康患者的68处牙龈退缩纳入临床记录,并在基线和6个月后进行统计学评估。首先,对三位手术医生之间的临床参数(附着水平、袋深度、退缩高度、退缩宽度和牙龈角化组织高度)进行校准。然后,选择单处或多处牙龈退缩,由外科医生(A、B、C)将手术技术标准化。三位手术医生获得的牙根覆盖百分比分别为:A医生81%,B医生85%,C医生89%,平均为85%;初始退缩高度值分别为2.5毫米(A)、4.3毫米(B)和4.4毫米(C)。该试验的初步结果表明,无论退缩型缺损的初始尺寸如何,也无论手术医生的学习曲线和经验如何,这种手术技术都能带来良好的临床效果。