Patrício Joana, Neto João Magalhães, Teixeira Heliana, Salas Fuensanta, Marques João Carlos
IMAR-Institute of Marine Research, c/o Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal.
Mar Environ Res. 2009 Jul;68(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
Accurate and reliable benthic quality indicators are in great demand following the recent developments and the strict time schedule for implementing the European Water Framework Directive. The Mondego estuary has experienced a progressive deterioration during the 1990s, followed by a partial ecological recovery due to restoration measures in 1997/1998. We have used the estuary as a model system to test the performance and robustness of a set of ecological indicators in highlighting the changes in the ecological state of intertidal areas. Over a period of 17 years (1985-2002), we calculated Margalef, Shannon-Wiener, Berger-Parker, Taxonomic Distinctness measures, AZTI's Marine Biotic Index, Infaunal Trophic Index, and Eco-Exergy based indices and tested differences across periods characterised by different anthropogenic disturbance. We combined temporal data within three periods: before, during and after disturbance, based on progressive information on the changes in the extended type of anthropogenic disturbance. Indices were then compared with biological and abiotic descriptors (macroalgae, macrophytes, benthic macrofauna, nutrients concentration, sediment grain size and total organic carbon). We found great disparity in the indicators ability to capture temporal changes, showing distinct performances at each site. At the Zostera noltii site, only Margalef, Total Taxonomic Distinctness and the thermodynamically based indices captured temporal changes, despite giving higher values during the disturbance period. At the bare sediment site, Taxonomic Distinctness, ITI, Shannon-Wiener, Berger-Parker, AMBI and the TBI were able to distinguish between periods, in agreement with the differences observed analysing the macrobenthic assemblages. Furthermore, Taxonomic Distinctness was not robust enough to detect any temporal or spatial change. We thus suggest further research to understand the behaviour of ecological indicators, in view of their crucial importance for the management and protection of marine coastal areas.
随着近期的发展以及实施欧洲水框架指令的严格时间安排,对准确可靠的底栖生物质量指标有了巨大需求。蒙德古河口在20世纪90年代经历了逐步恶化,随后由于1997/1998年的恢复措施实现了部分生态恢复。我们将该河口作为一个模型系统,以测试一组生态指标在突出潮间带生态状态变化方面的性能和稳健性。在17年(1985 - 2002年)的时间里,我们计算了马加莱夫指数、香农 - 维纳指数、伯杰 - 帕克指数、分类学差异度量、AZTI海洋生物指数、底栖动物营养指数以及基于生态能值的指数,并测试了不同人为干扰特征时期之间的差异。我们根据关于人为干扰扩展类型变化的逐步信息,将时间数据组合在三个时期:干扰前、干扰期间和干扰后。然后将这些指数与生物和非生物描述符(大型藻类、大型植物、底栖大型动物、营养物浓度、沉积物粒度和总有机碳)进行比较。我们发现各指标捕捉时间变化的能力存在巨大差异,在每个站点表现出不同的性能。在无叶小苦草站点,尽管在干扰期数值较高,但只有马加莱夫指数、总分类学差异指数和基于热力学的指数捕捉到了时间变化。在裸沉积物站点,分类学差异指数、ITI、香农 - 维纳指数、伯杰 - 帕克指数、AMBI和TBI能够区分不同时期,这与分析大型底栖动物群落时观察到的差异一致。此外,分类学差异指数不够稳健,无法检测到任何时间或空间变化。因此,鉴于生态指标对海洋沿海地区管理和保护的至关重要性,我们建议进一步开展研究以了解其行为。