• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病例对照设计与癌症筛查效果评估

The case-control design and the assessment of the efficacy of cancer screening.

作者信息

Connor R J, Prorok P C, Weed D L

机构信息

Biometry Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1215-21. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90154-2.

DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90154-2
PMID:1941016
Abstract

Case-control studies have been used in recent years to evaluate the efficacy of cancer screening. However, relatively little work has been done to examine the methodology itself for this purpose. In this paper, it is demonstrated that because of self-selection bias the case-control study can yield a biased estimate of screening efficacy. Further, it is shown how this bias can be assessed using data from a randomized trial. Using data from the HIP breast cancer screening study, the magnitude of the self-selection bias is estimated and is seen to be substantial.

摘要

近年来,病例对照研究已被用于评估癌症筛查的效果。然而,针对这一目的对该方法本身进行检验的工作相对较少。本文表明,由于自我选择偏倚,病例对照研究可能会得出有偏差的筛查效果估计值。此外,还展示了如何使用随机试验的数据来评估这种偏倚。利用来自HIP乳腺癌筛查研究的数据,估计了自我选择偏倚的大小,发现其相当可观。

相似文献

1
The case-control design and the assessment of the efficacy of cancer screening.病例对照设计与癌症筛查效果评估
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1215-21. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90154-2.
2
Re: Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level.关于:根据风险水平进行社区乳腺癌筛查的效果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Nov 16;97(22):1703; author reply 1703-4. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji379.
3
Minor influence of self-selection bias on the effectiveness of breast cancer screening in case-control studies in the Netherlands.荷兰病例对照研究中,自身选择偏倚对乳腺癌筛查效果的影响较小。
J Med Screen. 2011;18(3):142-6. doi: 10.1258/jms.2011.011027.
4
A case-control evaluation of the effect of breast cancer screening in the United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer.英国乳腺癌早期检测试验中乳腺癌筛查效果的病例对照评估。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug;46(4):362-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.4.362.
5
Pitfalls in using case-control studies for the evaluation of the effectiveness of breast screening programmes.应用病例对照研究评估乳腺筛查项目效果时的陷阱。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2013 Sep;22(5):391-7. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32835ccca4.
6
Evaluation of breast cancer service screening programme with a Bayesian approach: mortality analysis in a Finnish region.基于贝叶斯方法的乳腺癌服务筛查计划评估:芬兰某地区的死亡率分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jun;121(3):671-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0604-x. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
7
Case-control studies of screening.
Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Mar;20(1):1-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.1.1.
8
Efficacy of mammographic screening of the elderly: a case-referent study in the Nijmegen program in The Netherlands.老年女性乳腺钼靶筛查的效果:荷兰奈梅亨项目的病例对照研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Jun 15;86(12):934-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.12.934.
9
A remarkable reduction of breast cancer deaths in screened versus unscreened women: a case-referent study.筛查与未筛查女性的乳腺癌死亡率显著降低:病例对照研究。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Oct;21(10):1569-73. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9585-7. Epub 2010 May 30.
10
[Efficacy of mass screening for breast cancer; reduction in mortality nationally and abroad].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1991 Feb 9;135(6):242-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Selection Bias in Randomized and Observational Studies on Screening Mammography: A Quantitative Assessment.乳腺钼靶筛查随机和观察性研究中的自我选择偏倚:定量评估
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May 1;17:441-450. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S515464. eCollection 2025.
2
Fecal Immunochemical Testing and the Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia: A Difference-In-Difference Analysis.粪便免疫化学检测与晚期结直肠肿瘤风险:一项双重差分分析
JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Jan;10:e2300188. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00188.
3
Latent class instrumental variables: a clinical and biostatistical perspective.
潜在类别工具变量:临床与生物统计学视角
Stat Med. 2016 Jan 15;35(1):147-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.6612. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
4
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.通过乳房X线摄影术筛查乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 4;2013(6):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5.
5
Residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness.调整年龄后仍存在残余混杂:乳腺癌筛查效果中的一个小问题。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;26(8):585-8. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9584-3. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
6
Estimation and inference for the causal effect of receiving treatment on a multinomial outcome: an alternative approach.接受治疗对多项结果的因果效应的估计与推断:一种替代方法。
Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):319-23; discussion 323-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01451_1.x.
7
Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.评估卫生干预措施在成本效益分析中的有效性。卫生与医学成本效益小组。
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Sep;12(9):551-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07107.x.
8
Screening for colorectal cancer by immunochemical fecal occult blood testing.通过免疫化学粪便潜血检测筛查结直肠癌。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1996 Oct;87(10):1011-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1996.tb03103.x.
9
Case-control study of gastric cancer screening in Venezuela.委内瑞拉胃癌筛查的病例对照研究。
Br J Cancer. 1994 Jun;69(6):1102-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.216.
10
Efficacy of lung cancer screening; comparison of results from a case-control study and a survival analysis. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group.肺癌筛查的效果;病例对照研究与生存分析结果的比较。日本肺癌筛查研究组。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1992 May;83(5):424-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1992.tb01945.x.