• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带置信度的似然比:诊断试验研究的样本量估计

Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies.

作者信息

Simel D L, Samsa G P, Matchar D B

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, North Carolina 27705.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(8):763-70. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-v.

DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-v
PMID:1941027
Abstract

Confidence intervals are important summary measures that provide useful information from clinical investigations, especially when comparing data from different populations or sites. Studies of a diagnostic test should include both point estimates and confidence intervals for the tests' sensitivity and specificity. Equally important measures of a test's efficiency are likelihood ratios at each test outcome level. We present a method for calculating likelihood ratio confidence intervals for tests that have positive or negative results, tests with non-positive/non-negative results, and tests reported on an ordinal outcome scale. In addition, we demonstrate a sample size estimation procedure for diagnostic test studies based on the desired likelihood ratio confidence interval. The renewed interest in confidence intervals in the medical literature is important, and should be extended to studies analyzing diagnostic tests.

摘要

置信区间是重要的汇总指标,能从临床研究中提供有用信息,尤其是在比较来自不同人群或地点的数据时。诊断试验的研究应包括试验敏感度和特异度的点估计值和置信区间。试验效率的同样重要的指标是每个试验结果水平的似然比。我们提出了一种方法,用于计算结果为阳性或阴性的试验、结果为非阳性/非阴性的试验以及按有序结果量表报告的试验的似然比置信区间。此外,我们展示了一种基于所需似然比置信区间的诊断试验研究样本量估计程序。医学文献中对置信区间重新产生的兴趣很重要,并且应扩展到分析诊断试验的研究中。

相似文献

1
Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies.带置信度的似然比:诊断试验研究的样本量估计
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(8):763-70. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-v.
2
A Bayesian approach to toxicological testing.贝叶斯方法在毒理学测试中的应用。
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2020 Sep;105:106898. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2020.106898. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
3
A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: the effect on physicians' post-test probability estimates.一项关于描述检验准确性方法的随机试验:对医生检验后概率估计的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 2;143(3):184-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020-00004.
4
Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics.生物医学信息学诊断试验研究中的样本量估计。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
5
Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity.基于经验似然的固定特异度下连续型诊断试验敏感度的置信区间。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Jun;20(3):217-31. doi: 10.1177/0962280209105512. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
6
Determining qualitative effect size ratings using a likelihood ratio scatter matrix in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.在诊断试验准确性系统评价中使用似然比散点矩阵确定定性效应量等级。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Nov 27;5(4):205-214. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0061.
7
A likelihood ratio approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.诊断性研究荟萃分析的似然比方法
J Med Screen. 2003;10(1):47-51. doi: 10.1258/096914103321610806.
8
Point and interval estimation of accuracies of a binary medical diagnostic test following group sequential testing.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Jul 13;366(1874):2335-45. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0041.
9
Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.用于识别结直肠癌患者营养不良的营养评估工具的诊断测试准确性:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):141-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1673.
10
The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986 Aug;110(8):689-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity of the German version of the Stay Independent Questionnaire applied by telephone interview: A diagnostic accuracy study.通过电话访谈应用的德语版《保持独立问卷》的效度:一项诊断准确性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0319726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319726. eCollection 2025.
2
AI-derived CT biomarker score for robust COVID-19 mortality prediction across multiple waves and regions using machine learning.基于人工智能的CT生物标志物评分,通过机器学习对多波疫情和多个地区的新冠病毒肺炎死亡情况进行可靠预测。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 6;15(1):28727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14667-9.
3
Clinical Performance of the Elecsys CSF pTau/Aβ Ratio for Concordance with Tau-PET in Two Independent Cohorts.
Elecsys脑脊液pTau/Aβ比值在两个独立队列中与Tau-PET一致性的临床性能
Neurol Ther. 2025 Jul 20. doi: 10.1007/s40120-025-00798-8.
4
External validation of QUiPP App in three independent European cohorts of symptomatic women.QUiPP应用程序在三个独立的有症状女性欧洲队列中的外部验证。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Aug;66(2):163-174. doi: 10.1002/uog.29263. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
5
Multisite Validation of a Strategy to Identify Very Low Risk Emergency Department Patients Without Troponin.一种用于识别无肌钙蛋白的极低风险急诊科患者策略的多中心验证
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun 18;4(7):101913. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101913.
6
Microscopic and Molecular Identification of Species in Domestic Rabbits () in Romania.罗马尼亚家兔()物种的微观和分子鉴定
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 11;15(8):1109. doi: 10.3390/ani15081109.
7
Diagnosis of Peritonsillar Abscess-A Prospective Study Comparing Clinical with CT Findings in 133 Consecutive Patients.扁桃体周围脓肿的诊断——一项对133例连续患者的临床与CT表现进行比较的前瞻性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;15(2):228. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020228.
8
Performance of the High-STEACS Early Rule Out Pathway Using hs-cTnT at 30 Days in a Multisite US Cohort.在美国多中心队列中,使用高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T的高STEACS早期排除途径在30天时的表现。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Feb;18(2):e011084. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011084. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
9
Ultrasound identification of the cementoenamel junction and clinical correlation through ex vivo analysis.通过离体分析对牙骨质牙釉质界进行超声识别及临床相关性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 13;14(1):27821. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79081-z.
10
The High-Sensitivity HEART Pathway Safely Reduces Hospitalizations Regardless of Sex or Race in a Multisite Prospective US Cohort.高敏心脏标志物检测路径可安全减少住院,无论患者性别或种族如何——一项多中心前瞻性美国队列研究
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Oct;47(10):e70027. doi: 10.1002/clc.70027.