Beran Roy G, Gerber Paul, Devereux John A
Centre for Epilepsy Research and Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Med J Aust. 2009 May 4;190(9):503-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02529.x.
Regina v Gillett deals with a man who did not disclose his epilepsy when seeking a drivers licence. Subsequently, he had a seizure while driving, causing an accident in which three people died. He was found guilty but appealed. During the trial to decide whether Gillett was guilty of dangerous driving occasioning death, the judge decided that the Austroads fitness-to-drive guidelines were extraneous to legal consideration of the acceptable risk to be attached to chronic medical conditions. Although the appeal was unsuccessful with respect to guilt and sentencing, it did reinstate the relevance of the Austroads guidelines when evaluating suitable risk with respect to potentially dangerous drivers. We suggest that even greater protection can be afforded to the community if a clearly enunciated warning, outlining a driver's responsibilities, were to appear on each drivers license.
Regina诉吉列特案涉及一名男子,他在申请驾照时未透露自己患有癫痫。随后,他在驾车时癫痫发作,引发了一起导致三人死亡的事故。他被判有罪,但提出了上诉。在判定吉列特是否犯有危险驾驶致人死亡罪的审判中,法官认定澳大利亚道路运输局的驾驶适宜性指南与对慢性病应承担的可接受风险进行法律考量无关。尽管上诉在有罪认定和量刑方面未获成功,但在评估潜在危险驾驶员的适当风险时,确实恢复了澳大利亚道路运输局指南的相关性。我们认为,如果在每张驾照上都能出现一条明确阐述驾驶员责任的警告,就能为社区提供更大的保护。