Suppr超能文献

抗原修复和一抗类型影响CD117免疫组化的敏感性,但不影响特异性。

Antigen retrieval and primary antibody type affect sensitivity but not specificity of CD117 immunohistochemistry.

作者信息

Wong Newton A C S, Melegh Zsombor

机构信息

Department of Histopathology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Histopathology. 2009 Apr;54(5):529-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03272.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the effects of antigen retrieval and primary antibody selection on specificity and sensitivity of CD117 immunohistochemistry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A survey and literature review were performed to determine the most commonly used CD117 antibodies. Of six such antibodies, three (Neomarkers polyclonal RB-1518, Novocastra monoclonal T595 and Santa Cruz polyclonal C19) were rejected as only suboptimal immunoreactivity was produced despite the use of various immunohistochemical protocols. Immunohistochemistry using the three remaining antibodies (Cell Marque polyclonal CMC766, Dako polyclonal A4502 and Epitomics monoclonal YR145) was performed, with and without (for Dako and Epitomics antibodies) antigen retrieval, on 32 gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) and on 139 neoplasms (comprising 24 neoplasm types) that are differential diagnoses for GIST and/or have been reported to express CD117. Antigen retrieval generally increased the sensitivity but did not alter the specificity of immunoreactivity with the three antibodies. The different antibodies showed variations in sensitivity, but did not stain different spectrums of neoplasm type. A small number of neoplasms showed scattered nuclear immunopositivity (particularly seen without antigen retrieval), which was regarded as representing cross-reactivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Antigen retrieval and changing between the three antibodies tested affect sensitivity but not specificity of CD117 immunohistochemistry. Antigen retrieval does not produce false-positive CD117 immunostaining.

摘要

目的

研究抗原修复和一抗选择对CD117免疫组化特异性和敏感性的影响。

方法与结果

进行一项调查和文献综述以确定最常用的CD117抗体。在六种此类抗体中,三种(Neomarkers多克隆抗体RB - 1518、Novocastra单克隆抗体T595和Santa Cruz多克隆抗体C19)被排除,因为尽管使用了各种免疫组化方案,但仅产生了次优的免疫反应性。使用剩余的三种抗体(Cell Marque多克隆抗体CMC766、Dako多克隆抗体A4502和Epitomics单克隆抗体YR145),在有和没有(针对Dako和Epitomics抗体)抗原修复的情况下,对32例胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)以及139例肿瘤(包括24种肿瘤类型)进行免疫组化检测,这些肿瘤是GIST的鉴别诊断对象和/或已报道表达CD117。抗原修复通常会提高敏感性,但不会改变三种抗体免疫反应性的特异性。不同抗体在敏感性上存在差异,但对不同肿瘤类型谱的染色情况没有差异。少数肿瘤显示散在的核免疫阳性(特别是在没有抗原修复的情况下可见),这被认为代表交叉反应性。

结论

抗原修复以及在三种测试抗体之间切换会影响CD117免疫组化的敏感性,但不会影响其特异性。抗原修复不会产生假阳性的CD117免疫染色。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验