Garza Alex G, Gratton Matthew C, Salomone Joseph A, Lindholm Daniel, McElroy James, Archer Rex
Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Circulation. 2009 May 19;119(19):2597-605. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.815621. Epub 2009 May 4.
Cardiac arrest continues to have poor survival in the United States. Recent studies have questioned current practice in resuscitation. Our emergency medical services system made significant changes to the adult cardiac arrest resuscitation protocol, including minimizing chest compression interruptions, increasing the ratio of compressions to ventilation, deemphasizing or delaying intubation, and advocating chest compressions before initial countershock.
This retrospective observational cohort study reviewed all adult primary ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrests 36 months before and 12 months after the protocol change. Primary outcome was survival to discharge; secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation and cerebral performance category. Survival of out-of-hospital arrest of presumed primary cardiac origin improved from 7.5% (82 of 1097) in the historical cohort to 13.9% (47 of 339) in the revised protocol cohort (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 2.70). Similar increases in return of spontaneous circulation were achieved for the subset of witnessed cardiac arrest patients with initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation from 37.8% (54 of 143) to 59.6% (34 of 57) (odds ratio, 2.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.24 to 4.80). Survival to hospital discharge also improved from an unadjusted survival rate of 22.4% (32 of 143) to 43.9% (25 of 57) (odds ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.34 to 1.59) with the protocol. Of the 25 survivors, 88% (n=22) had favorable cerebral performance categories on discharge.
The changes to our prehospital protocol for adult cardiac arrest that optimized chest compressions and reduced disruptions increased the return of spontaneous circulation and survival to discharge in our patient population. These changes should be further evaluated for improving survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
在美国,心脏骤停患者的生存率仍然很低。最近的研究对当前的复苏实践提出了质疑。我们的紧急医疗服务系统对成人心脏骤停复苏方案进行了重大修改,包括尽量减少胸外按压中断、增加按压与通气的比例、不强调或延迟气管插管,并提倡在首次除颤前进行胸外按压。
这项回顾性观察队列研究回顾了方案改变前36个月和改变后12个月内所有成人原发性心室颤动和无脉性室性心动过速心脏骤停病例。主要结局是出院生存率;次要结局是自主循环恢复和脑功能分级。推测为原发性心脏起源的院外心脏骤停患者的生存率从历史队列中的7.5%(1097例中的82例)提高到修订方案队列中的13.9%(339例中的47例)(比值比,1.80;95%置信区间,1.19至2.70)。初始心律为心室颤动的目击心脏骤停患者亚组的自主循环恢复率也有类似提高,从37.8%(143例中的54例)提高到59.6%(57例中的34例)(比值比,2.44;95%置信区间,1.24至4.80)。按照该方案,出院生存率也从未经调整的22.4%(143例中的32例)提高到43.9%(57例中的25例)(比值比,2.71;95%置信区间,1.34至1.59)。在25名幸存者中,88%(n = 22)出院时脑功能分级良好。
我们对成人心脏骤停的院前方案所做的改变优化了胸外按压并减少了干扰,提高了我们患者群体的自主循环恢复率和出院生存率。这些改变应进一步评估,以提高院外心脏骤停患者 的生存率。