• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩后——接下来会怎样。

After parity--what's next.

作者信息

Shern David L, Beronio Kirsten K, Harbin Henry T

机构信息

Mental Health America (formerly the National Mental Health Association) in Alexandria, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):660-2. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.660.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.660
PMID:19414871
Abstract

A new law prohibiting unequal treatment limits and financial requirements for mental health and substance abuse (MH/SA) benefits establishes critical protections for 113 million Americans. The new parity law doesn't mandate coverage for MH/SA treatment and anticipates management of the benefit. Given these features, clear regulations mapping the intent of the law are critical. Education regarding the costs of untreated or ineffectively treated MH/SA conditions is needed to encourage comprehensive coverage, because academic performance and worker productivity are at stake. As health care reform proceeds, we must use the new law to reinforce the centrality of mental health to overall health.

摘要

一项禁止心理健康和药物滥用(MH/SA)福利方面不平等对待限制及财务要求的新法律为1.13亿美国人建立了关键保护措施。新的平等法并未强制要求涵盖MH/SA治疗,且预计会对福利进行管理。鉴于这些特点,明确映射该法律意图的规定至关重要。需要开展关于未治疗或治疗无效的MH/SA病症成本的教育,以鼓励全面覆盖,因为学业成绩和员工生产力都受到影响。随着医疗保健改革的推进,我们必须利用新法律来强化心理健康对整体健康的核心地位。

相似文献

1
After parity--what's next.分娩后——接下来会怎样。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):660-2. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.660.
2
Can legislation alone solve America's mental health dilemma? Current state legislative schemes cannot achieve mental health parity.仅靠立法就能解决美国的心理健康困境吗?当前的州立法计划无法实现心理健康平权。
Quinnipiac Health Law J. 2004;8:325-61.
3
Implementing mental health parity: the challenge for health plans.实施心理健康平权:健康计划面临的挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):663-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.663.
4
Behavioral health issue brief: parity and other insurance mandates for the treatment of mental illness and substance abuse: year end report-2003.行为健康问题简报:精神疾病和药物滥用治疗的平价及其他保险规定:2003年年终报告
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2003 Dec 31:1-36.
5
Medicare and mental health parity.医疗保险与心理健康平等法案。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):922. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.922.
6
Trends and issues in parity for behavioral healthcare coverage.行为健康保险覆盖范围的均等化趋势与问题。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1997 Aug;6(4):39, 74-6.
7
Mental health and substance abuse benefits in carve-out plans and the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996.分拆计划中的心理健康与药物滥用福利以及1996年的《心理健康平价法案》。
J Health Care Finance. 1998 Spring;24(3):82-92.
8
Comprehensive mental health benefits: a sound investment.全面的心理健康福利:一项明智的投资。
J Am Health Policy. 1993 Sep-Oct;3(5):15-21.
9
Mental health parity legislation.精神卫生平等立法。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2010 Sep;48(9):26-34. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20100730-06. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
10
Parity in mental health coverage: the goal of equal access to mental health treatment under the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 and the Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act of 2001.心理健康保险的平等性:1996年《心理健康平价法案》和2001年《心理健康公平治疗法案》所追求的平等获得心理健康治疗的目标。
Hamline Law Rev. 2003;26:377-413.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral health services in separate CHIP programs on the eve of parity.单独的儿童健康保险计划中的行为健康服务在平价法案前夕。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 May;39(3):147-57. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0340-5.
2
Laypersons' choices and deliberations for mental health coverage.非专业人士对心理健康保险的选择和考虑。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 May;39(3):158-69. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0341-4.