Department of Neuro Surgery, Neuro Sciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Dec;151(12):1575-82. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0335-0. Epub 2009 May 5.
The objective of this retrospective study was to study the outcome in patients with basal ganglia, thalamus and brainstem (central/deep) arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) and to compare the results with that for AVMs at other intracranial locations.
The results of 53 patients with central AVMs and 255 patients with AVMs at other locations treated with GKS at our center between April 1997 and March 2005 with minimum follow-up of 1 year were analyzed. CENTRAL AVMS: Forty of these 53 AVMs were Spetzler-Martin grade III, 11 were grade IV, and 2 were grade V. The mean AVM volume was 4.3 cm(3) (range 0.1-36.6 cm(3)). The mean marginal dose given was 23.3 Gy (range 16-25 Gy). The mean follow-up was 28 months (range 12-96 months). Check angiograms were advised at 2 years after GKS and yearly thereafter in the presence of residual AVM till 4 years. Presence of a residual AVM on an angiogram at 4 years after radiosurgery was considered as radiosurgical failure. Complete obliteration of the AVM was documented in 14 (74%) of the 19 patients with complete angiographic follow-up. Significantly lower obliteration rates (37% vs. 100%) were seen in larger AVMs (>3 cm(3)) and AVMs of higher (IV and V) Spetzler-Martin grades (28% vs. 100%). The 3- and 4-year actuarial rates of nidus obliteration were 68% and 74%, respectively. Eight patients (15%) developed radiation edema with a statistically significantly higher incidence in patients with AVM volume >3 cm(3) and in patients with Spetzler-Martin grade IV and V AVMs. Five patients (9.4%) had hemorrhage in the period of latency. COMPARISON OF RESULTS WITH AVMS AT OTHER LOCATIONS: Patients with central AVMs presented at a younger age (mean age 22.7 years vs. 29 years), with a very high proportion (81% vs. 63%) presenting with hemorrhage. Significantly higher incidence of radiation edema (15% vs. 5%) and lower obliteration rates (74% vs. 93%) were seen in patients with central AVMs.
GKS is an effective modality of treatment for central AVMs, though relatively lower obliteration rates and higher complication rates are seen compared to AVMs at other locations.
本回顾性研究旨在研究接受伽玛刀放射外科治疗的基底节、丘脑和脑干(中央/深部)动静脉畸形(AVM)患者的预后,并将结果与其他颅内位置的 AVM 进行比较。
分析了 1997 年 4 月至 2005 年 3 月期间在我们中心接受伽玛刀放射外科治疗的 53 例中央 AVM 患者和 255 例其他颅内位置 AVM 患者的结果,所有患者的随访时间均至少为 1 年。中央 AVM:53 例 AVM 中有 40 例为 Spetzler-Martin 分级 III 级,11 例为 IV 级,2 例为 V 级。平均 AVM 体积为 4.3cm³(范围 0.1-36.6cm³)。给予的平均边缘剂量为 23.3Gy(范围 16-25Gy)。平均随访时间为 28 个月(范围 12-96 个月)。在存在残留 AVM 的情况下,建议在 GKS 后 2 年进行血管造影检查,并在 4 年内每年进行一次,直至 4 年。放射外科治疗后 4 年血管造影上存在残留 AVM 被认为是放射外科治疗失败。19 例有完整血管造影随访的患者中,有 14 例(74%)完全闭塞 AVM。较大 AVM(>3cm³)和较高 Spetzler-Martin 分级(IV 和 V)的 AVM 闭塞率明显较低(37%比 100%)(28%比 100%)。3 年和 4 年的 AVM 闭塞的实际闭塞率分别为 68%和 74%。8 例(15%)出现放射性水肿,在 AVM 体积>3cm³的患者和 Spetzler-Martin 分级为 IV 和 V 的 AVM 患者中,发生率明显较高。5 例(9.4%)在潜伏期发生出血。与其他部位 AVM 相比:中央 AVM 患者的年龄更小(平均年龄 22.7 岁比 29 岁),出血比例非常高(81%比 63%)。中央 AVM 患者的放射性水肿发生率明显较高(15%比 5%),闭塞率较低(74%比 93%)。
伽玛刀放射外科是治疗中央 AVM 的有效方法,但与其他颅内位置的 AVM 相比,其闭塞率较低,并发症发生率较高。