Potts Matthew B, Jahangiri Arman, Jen Maxwell, Sneed Penny K, McDermott Michael W, Gupta Nalin, Hetts Steven W, Young William L, Lawton Michael T
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2014 Sep-Oct;82(3-4):386-94. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.03.033. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
This study sought to describe a single institution's experience treating arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the basal ganglia, thalamus, and insula in a multimodal fashion.
We conducted a retrospective review of all deep AVMs treated at our institution between 1997 and 2011 with attention to patient selection, treatment strategies, and radiographic and functional outcomes.
A total of 97 patients underwent initial treatment at our institution. 64% presented with hemorrhage with 29% located in the basal ganglia, 41% in the thalamus, and 30% in the insula. 80% were Spetzler-Martin grade III-IV. Initial treatment was microsurgical resection in 42%, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in 45%, and observation in 12%. Radiographic cure was achieved in 54% after initial surgical or SRS treatment (71% and 23%, respectively) and in 63% after subsequent treatments, with good functional outcomes in 78% (median follow-up 2.2 years). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed treatment group and age as factors associated with radiographic cure, whereas Spetzler-Martin score and time to follow-up were significantly associated with improved/unchanged functional status at time of last follow-up. Posttreatment hemorrhage occurred in 11% (7% of surgical and 18% of SRS patients).
Modern treatment of deep AVMs includes a multidisciplinary approach utilizing microsurgery, SRS, embolization, and observation. Supplementary grading adds meaningfully to traditional Spetzler-Martin grading to guide patient selection. Surgical resection is more likely to result in obliteration compared with SRS, and is associated with satisfactory results in carefully selected patients.
本研究旨在描述一家机构以多模式方式治疗基底神经节、丘脑和岛叶动静脉畸形(AVM)的经验。
我们对1997年至2011年间在本机构接受治疗的所有深部AVM进行了回顾性研究,重点关注患者选择、治疗策略以及影像学和功能结果。
共有97例患者在本机构接受了初始治疗。64%的患者出现出血,其中29%位于基底神经节,41%位于丘脑,30%位于岛叶。80%为Spetzler-Martin III-IV级。初始治疗中,42%为显微手术切除,45%为立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS),12%为观察。初始手术或SRS治疗后,54%实现了影像学治愈(分别为71%和23%),后续治疗后为63%,78%的患者功能结果良好(中位随访2.2年)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,治疗组和年龄是与影像学治愈相关的因素,而Spetzler-Martin评分和随访时间与最后一次随访时功能状态改善/未改变显著相关。治疗后出血发生率为11%(手术患者为7%,SRS患者为18%)。
深部AVM的现代治疗包括采用显微手术、SRS、栓塞和观察的多学科方法。补充分级对传统的Spetzler-Martin分级有重要补充意义,可指导患者选择。与SRS相比,手术切除更有可能实现闭塞,在精心挑选的患者中可取得满意结果。