Suppr超能文献

扫描激光偏振仪中非典型双折射模式的预测因素

Predictors of atypical birefringence pattern in scanning laser polarimetry.

作者信息

Qiu K, Leung C K S, Weinreb R N, Liu S, Chueng C Y L, Li H, Zhang M-Z, Pang C-P, Lam D S C

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;93(9):1191-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.152595. Epub 2009 May 4.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate predictors of atypical birefringence patterns (ABP) observed in scanning laser polarimetry.

METHODS

A total of 179 eyes from 82 normal subjects and 97 glaucoma patients were included. The retinal nerve fibre layer in each eye was imaged sequentially with GDx variable corneal compensation (VCC) and GDx enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California). The associations between the typical scan score (TSS) and age, axial length, spherical error, parapapillary atrophy (PPA) and visual-field mean deviation (MD) were evaluated with univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

23.5% (42/179) and 5.0% (9/179) of subjects had ABP (TSS<80) with GDx VCC and GDx ECC, respectively. For both GDx VCC and ECC, the TSS was significantly correlated with age, axial length, spherical error and PPA, but not with visual-field MD. After adjusting the effect of covariates, the axial length/spherical error and PPA were significantly associated with GDx VCC TSS, whereas the axial length/spherical error was the only predictor for GDx ECC TSS. Myopic eyes were more likely to develop ABP in both GDx VCC and ECC.

CONCLUSIONS

Axial length or spherical error is a significant predictor for ABP with both GDx VCC and GDx ECC. Caution should be exercised in interpreting the results of scanning laser polarimetry in eyes with a long axial length or myopia.

摘要

目的

评估在扫描激光偏振仪中观察到的非典型双折射模式(ABP)的预测因素。

方法

纳入了82名正常受试者和97名青光眼患者的179只眼睛。使用GDx可变角膜补偿(VCC)和GDx增强角膜补偿(ECC)(卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司,加利福尼亚州都柏林)对每只眼睛的视网膜神经纤维层进行顺序成像。通过单因素和多因素回归分析评估典型扫描评分(TSS)与年龄、眼轴长度、球镜度数、视盘旁萎缩(PPA)和视野平均缺损(MD)之间的关联。

结果

分别有23.5%(42/179)和5.0%(9/179)的受试者在使用GDx VCC和GDx ECC时出现ABP(TSS<80)。对于GDx VCC和ECC,TSS均与年龄、眼轴长度、球镜度数和PPA显著相关,但与视野MD无关。在调整协变量的影响后,眼轴长度/球镜度数和PPA与GDx VCC TSS显著相关,而眼轴长度/球镜度数是GDx ECC TSS的唯一预测因素。近视眼中使用GDx VCC和ECC时更易出现ABP。

结论

眼轴长度或球镜度数是使用GDx VCC和GDx ECC时ABP的重要预测因素。对于眼轴长度较长或近视的眼睛,在解释扫描激光偏振仪的结果时应谨慎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验