• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本地得出的出生体重列线图的重要性。

Importance of locally derived birth weight nomograms.

作者信息

Sloan C T, Lorenz R P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1991 Aug;36(8):598-602.

PMID:1941802
Abstract

Significant differences exist between the published nomograms of birth weight for gestational age. Differences in demographics, altitude above sea level and study methodology have all been implicated. A three-year experience of uncomplicated singleton gestations (N = 14,766) was analyzed for birth weight and gestational age. The mean, 10th percentile and their 95% confidence intervals were compared to Brenner's data and a pooled sample from other studies in this country. The mean birth weights were significantly higher than Brenner's after 32 weeks' gestation and higher than the pooled mean after 35. The 10th percentiles were significantly greater than Brenner's after 36 weeks' gestation. Approximately 66% of neonates at risk, below our 10th percentile, would not be identified with Brenner's criteria. We agree with Goldenberg that uniform criteria for the definition of the normal population are important in identifying aberrant growth. However, birth weight standards should be developed for the specific population in question.

摘要

不同孕周出生体重的列线图之间存在显著差异。人口统计学、海拔高度和研究方法的差异都被认为是相关因素。对14766例单胎妊娠无并发症的三年经验进行了出生体重和孕周分析。将均值、第10百分位数及其95%置信区间与布伦纳的数据以及该国其他研究的汇总样本进行了比较。妊娠32周后平均出生体重显著高于布伦纳的数据,妊娠35周后高于汇总均值。妊娠36周后第10百分位数显著高于布伦纳的数据。在我们第10百分位数以下的高危新生儿中,约66%不符合布伦纳的标准。我们同意戈德堡的观点,即正常人群定义的统一标准对于识别异常生长很重要。然而,应该针对特定人群制定出生体重标准。

相似文献

1
Importance of locally derived birth weight nomograms.本地得出的出生体重列线图的重要性。
J Reprod Med. 1991 Aug;36(8):598-602.
2
The risks of spontaneous preterm delivery and perinatal mortality in relation to size at birth according to fetal versus neonatal growth standards.根据胎儿与新生儿生长标准,探讨自发性早产风险及围产期死亡率与出生体重的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;184(5):946-53. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.111719.
3
An analysis of birth weight by gestational age using a computerized perinatal data base, 1975-1992.利用计算机化围产期数据库对1975年至1992年按孕周分析出生体重
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Mar;83(3):342-52.
4
Analysis of birth weight percentile as a predictor of perinatal outcome.分析出生体重百分位数作为围产期结局的预测指标。
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Oct;68(4):459-63.
5
Construction of intrauterine growth curves in a high altitude area of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯高海拔地区宫内生长曲线的构建
Saudi Med J. 2005 Nov;26(11):1723-7.
6
Birth weight charts for gestational age in 63,620 healthy infants born in Peruvian public hospitals at low and at high altitude.秘鲁公立医院出生的63620名低海拔和高海拔健康婴儿的孕周出生体重图表。
Acta Paediatr. 2009 Mar;98(3):454-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01137.x. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
7
An analysis of birth weight by gestational age in Canada.加拿大按孕周对出生体重进行的分析。
CMAJ. 1989 Jan 15;140(2):157-60, 165.
8
Intrauterine growth standards in a developing country: a study of singleton livebirths at 28-42 weeks' gestation.一个发展中国家的宫内生长标准:对妊娠28至42周单胎活产儿的一项研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;21(5):387-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00827.x.
9
Fetal growth risk curves: defining levels of fetal growth restriction by neonatal death risk.胎儿生长风险曲线:根据新生儿死亡风险定义胎儿生长受限水平。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.069. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
10
Effect of intrauterine growth restriction on kidney function at young adult age: the Nord Trøndelag Health (HUNT 2) Study.宫内生长受限对年轻成年人肾功能的影响:北特伦德拉格健康研究(HUNT 2)
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jan;51(1):10-20. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.09.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Small for gestational age: towards 2004.小于胎龄儿:迈向2004年。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2003 Nov;26(11):1143-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03345265.