Panchabhai Tanmay S, Dangayach Neha S, Krishnan Anand, Kothari Vatsal M, Karnad Dilip R
Medical-Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medicine, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Medical-Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medicine, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Chest. 2009 May;135(5):1150-1156. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1321.
Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine decreases the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in patients after cardiac surgery. However, evidence of its benefit in ICU patients is conflicting.
Patients admitted to the ICU of an Indian tertiary care teaching hospital were randomized to twice-daily oropharyngeal cleansing with 0.2% chlorhexidine or 0.01% potassium permanganate (control) solution. Effects on the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia during ICU stay (primary outcome) and length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality (secondary outcomes) were studied.
Five hundred twelve patients were randomized to either the chlorhexidine group (n = 250) or the control group (n = 262). Of the 471 subjects who completed the protocol, nosocomial pneumonia developed in 16 of 224 subjects (7.1%) in the chlorhexidine group and 19 of 247 subjects (7.7%) in the control group (p = 0.82; relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 1.76); intention-to-treat analysis of 21 patients in whom the cleansing protocol was not followed revealed similar results. There was no significant difference between the study and control groups in the median day of development of pneumonia (5.0 days: interquartile range [IQR], 3.0 to 7.7 vs 5.0 days: IQR, 3.0 to 6.0, respectively), median ICU stay (5.0 days: IQR, 3.0 to 8.0 vs 6.0 days: IQR, 3.0 to 8.0, respectively), and mortality (34.8% vs 28.3%, respectively). On subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in the primary and secondary outcomes in patients on mechanical ventilation, tracheal intubation, and coma (Glasgow coma scale <or= 8). During the study period, nosocomial pneumonia developed in fewer subjects (35 of 471 subjects [7.4%]) than in the 3 months preceding and following the study (98 of 452 subjects [21.7%]; p < 0.001; relative risk, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.49).
Oropharyngeal cleansing with 0.2% chlorhexidine solution was not superior to oral cleansing with the control solution. However, the decreased incidence of nosocomial pneumonia during the study period suggests a possible benefit of meticulous oral hygiene in ICU patients.
心脏手术后患者使用洗必泰进行口腔清洁可降低医院获得性肺炎的发生率。然而,其在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中的益处证据存在矛盾。
印度一家三级护理教学医院ICU收治的患者被随机分为两组,分别用0.2%洗必泰溶液或0.01%高锰酸钾溶液(对照组)每日进行两次口咽清洁。研究了对ICU住院期间医院获得性肺炎发生率(主要结局)、ICU住院时间和住院死亡率(次要结局)的影响。
512例患者被随机分为洗必泰组(n = 250)或对照组(n = 262)。在471例完成方案的受试者中,洗必泰组224例中有16例(7.1%)发生医院获得性肺炎,对照组247例中有19例(7.7%)发生(p = 0.82;相对危险度,0.93;95%置信区间,0.49至1.76);对21例未遵循清洁方案的患者进行意向性分析显示了相似的结果。研究组和对照组在肺炎发生的中位天数(分别为5.0天:四分位间距[IQR],3.0至7.7天与5.0天:IQR,3.0至6.0天)、ICU中位住院时间(分别为5.0天:IQR,3.0至8.0天与6.0天:IQR,3.0至8.0天)和死亡率(分别为34.8%与28.3%)方面无显著差异。亚组分析显示,在机械通气、气管插管和昏迷(格拉斯哥昏迷量表≤8)的患者中,主要和次要结局无显著差异。在研究期间,发生医院获得性肺炎的受试者(471例中的35例[7.4%])少于研究前后3个月(452例中的98例[21.7%];p < 0.001;相对危险度,0.34;95%置信区间,0.24至0.49)。
用0.2%洗必泰溶液进行口咽清洁并不优于用对照溶液进行口腔清洁。然而,研究期间医院获得性肺炎发生率的降低表明精心的口腔卫生对ICU患者可能有益。