Suppr超能文献

格列酮类药物对2型糖尿病患者代谢及血流动力学参数的影响。

Impact of glitazones on metabolic and haemodynamic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Chogtu B, Singh N P, Chawla S, Gupta U

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2009 Apr;50(4):395-9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus is a common disorder associated with a number of metabolic abnormalities such as insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia and high blood pressure. These abnormalities are recognised risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Insulin-sensitising drugs exert an effect on these cardiovascular risk factors. The present study was done with the objective of elucidating the differences in glycaemic control, plasma lipid levels and blood pressure in diabetic patients who were prescribed glitazones in combination with sulphonylureas.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone in addition to glimepiride in an open-labelled study. Fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels, glycosylated haemoglobin, fasting lipid profile and blood pressure were recorded at baseline and at various intervals until the end of the study period at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients (28 in the pioglitazone group and 28 in the rosiglitazone group) completed the study. There was no significant difference in the baseline values of various parameters between the two treatment groups. The efficacy of the two treatment groups was similar in terms of the maintenance of blood glucose levels (fasting blood glucose, p-value is 0.10; postprandial blood glucose, p-value is 0.95; glycosylated haemoglobin, p-value is 0.30) and the effect on blood pressure (systolic blood pressure, p-value is 0.45; diastolic blood pressure, p-value is 0.95), while the pioglitazone group showed significantly better efficacy in improving the lipid profile compared to the rosiglitazone group (total cholesterol, p-value is 0.002; triglycerides, p-value is 0.002; low density lipoprotein, p-value is 0.005; and high density lipoprotein, p-value is 0.43).

CONCLUSION

The two drugs showed a similar effect on blood glucose levels and blood pressure. However, the pioglitazone group was superior to the rosiglitazone group in improving the lipid profile.

摘要

引言

糖尿病是一种常见疾病,与多种代谢异常相关,如胰岛素抵抗、血脂异常和高血压。这些异常是公认的心血管疾病危险因素。胰岛素增敏药物对这些心血管危险因素有作用。本研究旨在阐明联合使用格列酮与磺脲类药物的糖尿病患者在血糖控制、血脂水平和血压方面的差异。

方法

在一项开放标签研究中,患者被随机分配接受除格列美脲外的吡格列酮或罗格列酮。在基线时以及直到12周研究期结束的不同时间间隔记录空腹和餐后血糖水平、糖化血红蛋白、空腹血脂谱和血压。

结果

共有56例患者(吡格列酮组28例,罗格列酮组28例)完成了研究。两个治疗组之间各种参数的基线值无显著差异。在维持血糖水平(空腹血糖,p值为0.10;餐后血糖,p值为0.95;糖化血红蛋白,p值为0.30)和对血压的影响(收缩压,p值为0.45;舒张压,p值为0.95)方面,两个治疗组的疗效相似,而吡格列酮组在改善血脂谱方面显示出比罗格列酮组显著更好的疗效(总胆固醇,p值为0.002;甘油三酯,p值为0.002;低密度脂蛋白,p值为0.005;高密度脂蛋白,p值为0.43)。

结论

两种药物对血糖水平和血压显示出相似的作用。然而,吡格列酮组在改善血脂谱方面优于罗格列酮组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验