State University of New York at Buffalo and Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY 14209, USA.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Mar;28(3):258-67. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1305.
The prevalence of dyslipidaemia and the risk of cardiovascular disease are elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes. This analysis compared the effects of insulin glargine versus thiazolidinediones (TZDs) on lipid profiles.
Patient-level data were pooled from two randomized clinical studies. The population included 552 men and women aged >18 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months, on metformin and/or sulphonylurea, and with A(1C) ≥7.5% and <12.0% at screening. Lipid outcome measures included change from baseline in lipid levels [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides, and free fatty acids] and attainment of lipid goals for LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and triglycerides.
Both insulin glargine and TZDs improved lipid profiles from baseline values. Compared with TZDs, treatment with insulin glargine led to 7.9% greater reduction in LDL-C (p < 0.0003), 7.5% greater reduction in non-HDL-C (p < 0.0001), and 7.8% greater reduction in total cholesterol (p < 0.0001), whereas the HDL-C increase with TZD was 7.6% greater than that with insulin glargine (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients attaining the lipid goals was comparable between insulin glargine and pioglitazone, but lower for rosiglitazone. Insulin glargine improved glycaemic control more than TZDs; however, insulin glargine caused more hypoglycaemia. Treatment with TZDs caused more weight gain and peripheral oedema.
These findings suggest that the favourable effects of insulin glargine on plasma lipid profiles should be considered among the advantages of treatment with insulin glargine as they are for TZDs.
2 型糖尿病患者的血脂异常患病率和心血管疾病风险升高。本分析比较了甘精胰岛素与噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZDs)对血脂谱的影响。
从两项随机临床试验中汇集了患者水平数据。该人群包括 552 名年龄>18 岁的男性和女性,患有 2 型糖尿病至少 6 个月,在筛选时使用二甲双胍和/或磺酰脲类药物,且 A1C≥7.5%且<12.0%。脂质结局指标包括基线脂质水平的变化[低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)、总胆固醇、甘油三酯和游离脂肪酸]和 LDL-C、非-HDL-C 和甘油三酯的脂质目标达标情况。
甘精胰岛素和 TZDs 均改善了基线值的脂质谱。与 TZDs 相比,甘精胰岛素治疗导致 LDL-C 降低 7.9%(p<0.0003)、非-HDL-C 降低 7.5%(p<0.0001)和总胆固醇降低 7.8%(p<0.0001),而 TZD 引起的 HDL-C 升高比甘精胰岛素高 7.6%(p<0.0001)。甘精胰岛素和吡格列酮达到脂质目标的患者比例相当,但罗格列酮的比例较低。甘精胰岛素改善血糖控制的效果优于 TZDs;然而,甘精胰岛素引起更多的低血糖。TZDs 治疗引起更多的体重增加和外周水肿。
这些发现表明,甘精胰岛素对血浆脂质谱的有利影响应被视为甘精胰岛素治疗的优势之一,就像 TZDs 一样。