Schreinemachers Saskia A, van der Hulst Victor P M, Jaap Willems W, Bipat Shandra, van der Woude Henk-Jan
Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Oosterpark 9, Postbus 95500, Amsterdam 1090 HM, The Netherlands.
Skeletal Radiol. 2009 Jul;38(7):675-83. doi: 10.1007/s00256-009-0692-z. Epub 2009 May 7.
The purpose of this study is to retrospectively compare accuracy of single magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography series in Abduction External Rotation (ABER) with conventional MR arthrography for detection and characterisation of anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions, with arthroscopy as reference standard. Inter-observer variability of both protocols was determined.
Institutional review board approval was obtained; informed consent was waived. MR arthrograms, including oblique axial fat suppressed T1-weighted images in ABER position and conventional imaging directions of 250 patients (170 men, 80 women; mean age, 36 years), were retrospectively and independently evaluated by three reviewers. Reviewers were blinded to clinical information and arthroscopic results. Labroligamentous lesions were registered in both ABER and MRa. The lesions were sub-classified (Bankart, Perthes, anterior labrum periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALPSA) or lesions not otherwise specified). Inter-observer agreement was assessed by Kappa statistics for all 250 patients. Ninety-two of 250 patients underwent arthroscopy. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ABER versus conventional MR arthrography were calculated and compared using paired McNemar test.
Kappa values of the ABER and conventional MR arthrography ranged from 0.44 to 0.56 and 0.44 to 0.62, respectively. According to arthroscopy, 45 of 92 patients had an intact anteroinferior labrum, and in 44 patients, a labroligamentous lesion (eight Bankart, seven Perthes, 29 ALPSA and three lesions not otherwise specified) was diagnosed. There were no statistically significant differences between ABER and conventional MR arthrography regarding sensitivity (85-89%, 89-96%), specificity (82-91%, 84-89%) and overall accuracy (50-62%, 53-63%).
The results of a single MR arthrography series in ABER position are comparable with those of conventional MR arthrography for detecting anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions.
本研究旨在以关节镜检查为参考标准,回顾性比较外展外旋(ABER)位单序列磁共振(MR)关节造影与传统MR关节造影在检测和表征下盂唇韧带损伤方面的准确性。同时确定两种检查方案的观察者间变异性。
本研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准;无需患者签署知情同意书。回顾性分析了250例患者(170例男性,80例女性;平均年龄36岁)的MR关节造影图像,包括ABER位斜轴面脂肪抑制T1加权像以及传统成像方位像,由三位阅片者独立进行评估。阅片者对临床信息和关节镜检查结果不知情。记录ABER位和传统MR关节造影图像上的盂唇韧带损伤情况。对损伤进行亚分类(Bankart损伤、Perthes损伤、前盂唇骨膜袖套撕脱伤(ALPSA)或其他未明确分类的损伤)。采用Kappa统计量评估250例患者的观察者间一致性。250例患者中有92例行关节镜检查。计算并使用配对McNemar检验比较ABER位与传统MR关节造影的敏感性、特异性和准确性。
ABER位和传统MR关节造影的Kappa值分别为0.44至0.56和0.44至0.62。根据关节镜检查结果,92例患者中有45例下盂唇完整,44例诊断为盂唇韧带损伤(8例Bankart损伤、7例Perthes损伤、29例ALPSA损伤和3例其他未明确分类的损伤)。ABER位与传统MR关节造影在敏感性(85 - 89%,89 - 96%)、特异性(82 - 91%,84 - 89%)和总体准确性(50 - 62%,53 - 63%)方面无统计学显著差异。
ABER位单序列MR关节造影在检测下盂唇韧带损伤方面的结果与传统MR关节造影相当。