Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, PR China.
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Apr;82(4):651-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.038. Epub 2013 Jan 1.
The purpose of this study is to compare MR arthrography in abduction and external rotation (ABER) position with conventional MR arthrography in neutral position for the detection and further classification of anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions.
Two hundred and twenty-nine cases of shoulder MR arthrography with subsequent arthroscopy were retrospectively evaluated. All MR arthrograms in ABER position and neutral position were independently assessed by two radiologists who were blinded to the arthroscopic findings. Sensitivities and specificities of both positions for detection and further categorization of anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions were calculated and compared using paired McNemar test. K values were calculated to quantify the level of interobserver agreement.
At arthroscopy, 24 Bankart lesions, 59 ALPSA lesions, 39 Perthes lesions, 8 GLAD lesions, 4 ALIPSA lesions, 31 nonclassifiable lesions and 60 intact anteroinferior complexes were found. The sensitivity of MR arthrography in ABER position for detecting anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions was significantly higher than that of in neutral position (92.7-94.5% versus 81.8-83%, P<0.05). For the detection rate of the mentioned 6 subtypes of lesions, only the Perthes lesions had significant improvement in ABER position when compared with conventional MR arthrography (observer 1, 61.5-87.2%, P=0.006; observer 2, 69.2-92.3%, P=0.004). MR arthrography in ABER position was more effective in identifying of Perthes lesions (66.7-74.4% versus 35.9-40%, P<0.05) while the conventional MR arthrography was more effective in accurate diagnose of ALPSA lesions (74.6-78.0% versus 54.2-55.9%, P<0.05). No statistically significant difference of the diagnostic accuracy was found between the two positions for Bankart lesions, GLAD lesions, and ALIPSA lesions.
MR arthrography in ABER position has more added value on detection of Perthes lesions in evaluation of anteroinferior labroligamentous complex tear.
本研究旨在比较外展和外旋(ABER)位磁共振关节造影与中立位磁共振关节造影在检测和进一步分类前下盂唇-前关节囊复合体(Bankart)损伤中的作用。
回顾性分析了 229 例肩关节磁共振关节造影和随后的关节镜检查的病例。两名放射科医生在不了解关节镜检查结果的情况下,分别对 ABER 位和中立位的磁共振关节造影进行独立评估。使用配对 McNemar 检验计算两种体位检测和进一步分类前下盂唇-前关节囊复合体损伤的敏感性和特异性,并进行比较。计算 K 值以量化观察者间的一致性水平。
关节镜检查发现 24 例 Bankart 损伤、59 例 ALPSA 损伤、39 例 Perthes 损伤、8 例 GLAD 损伤、4 例 ALIPSA 损伤、31 例不可分类损伤和 60 例完整的前下盂唇复合体。ABER 位磁共振关节造影检测前下盂唇-前关节囊复合体损伤的敏感性明显高于中立位(92.7%-94.5%比 81.8%-83%,P<0.05)。对于上述 6 种病变类型的检出率,只有 Perthes 损伤在 ABER 位时较传统磁共振关节造影有显著提高(观察者 1:61.5%-87.2%,P=0.006;观察者 2:69.2%-92.3%,P=0.004)。ABER 位磁共振关节造影在识别 Perthes 损伤方面更有效(66.7%-74.4%比 35.9%-40%,P<0.05),而传统磁共振关节造影在准确诊断 ALPSA 损伤方面更有效(74.6%-78.0%比 54.2%-55.9%,P<0.05)。对于 Bankart 损伤、GLAD 损伤和 ALIPSA 损伤,两种体位的诊断准确性无统计学差异。
在评估前下盂唇-前关节囊复合体撕裂时,ABER 位磁共振关节造影在检测 Perthes 损伤方面具有更大的附加价值。