Selvaraj Raja J, Chauhan Vijay S
Division of Cardiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 May;32(5):632-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02337.x.
The modified moving average (MMA) and spectral method (SM) are commonly used to measure T-wave alternans (TWA), but their accuracy has not been compared in ambulatory electrocardiograms (ECGs) where TWA signal-to-noise ratio is low. Our objective was to compare the effect of noise and signal nonstationarity on the accuracy of TWA measurement using MMA versus SM when applied to synthetic and ambulatory ECGs.
Periodic and nonperiodic noise were added to noiseless synthetic ECGs. Simulated TWA (0-20 microV) was added to synthetic ECGs and ambulatory ECG recordings. TWA was measured using SM and MMA, and the measurement error relative to added TWA was compared. An MMA ratio was used to discriminate TWA signal from noise. Signal nonstationarity was simulated by changing heart rate, TWA magnitude, and TWA phase.
With no added TWA, MMA falsely measured TWA in synthetic and ambulatory ECGs, while false measurement was not seen with SM. An MMA ratio > 1.2 eliminated false TWA detection. In the presence of low TWA magnitude (<10 microV), TWA was overestimated by MMA and underestimated by SM in proportion to the noise level. In synthetic ECGs with periodic noise and 10-microV added TWA, MMA was less accurate than SM. The effects of simulated signal nonstationarity on the TWA magnitude measured with MMA versus SM were similar using a 64-beat analysis window.
In the presence of noise, MMA falsely detects or overestimates simulated TWA in ambulatory ECG recordings. In this setting, the proposed MMA ratio improves the specificity of MMA.
改良移动平均法(MMA)和频谱法(SM)常用于测量T波交替(TWA),但在动态心电图(ECG)中,其准确性尚未得到比较,因为动态心电图中TWA的信噪比很低。我们的目的是比较噪声和信号非平稳性对MMA与SM在应用于合成心电图和动态心电图时测量TWA准确性的影响。
将周期性和非周期性噪声添加到无噪声的合成心电图中。将模拟TWA(0 - 20微伏)添加到合成心电图和动态心电图记录中。使用SM和MMA测量TWA,并比较相对于添加的TWA的测量误差。使用MMA比率来区分TWA信号和噪声。通过改变心率、TWA幅度和TWA相位来模拟信号非平稳性。
在未添加TWA的情况下,MMA在合成心电图和动态心电图中错误地测量了TWA,而SM未出现错误测量。MMA比率>1.2可消除TWA的错误检测。在低TWA幅度(<10微伏)存在时,MMA高估了TWA,而SM则根据噪声水平低估了TWA。在具有周期性噪声和添加10微伏TWA的合成心电图中,MMA的准确性低于SM。使用64搏分析窗时,模拟信号非平稳性对用MMA与SM测量的TWA幅度的影响相似。
在存在噪声的情况下,MMA在动态心电图记录中错误地检测或高估了模拟TWA。在此情况下,所提出的MMA比率提高了MMA的特异性。