Shabsigh R, Fishman I J, Toombs B D, Skolkin M
Scott Department of Urology, St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas.
J Urol. 1991 Nov;146(5):1260-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38064-3.
A total of 50 patients with impotence underwent cavernosometry and cavernosography with intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs. Several hemodynamic parameters were analyzed, including the pressure response curve after injection of vasoactive drugs and infusion of saline, the volume required to achieve erection, venous outflow resistance, erection maintenance infusion rate, rate of pressure decrease after discontinuation of infusion and post-infusion steady state pressure. On the basis of cavernosometric findings, venous leakage was ruled out in 4 patients. In the remaining 46 patients leak sites visualized during cavernosography included superficial dorsal vein in 1 (2.2%), deep dorsal vein in all 46 (100%), cavernous veins in 32 (69.6%), glans in 19 (41.3%) and corpus spongiosum in 14 (30.4%). Aberrant veins were documented in 7 patients (15.2%) communicating with the saphenous vein in 4 (8.9%), scrotal veins in 2 (4.4%) and femoral veins in 1 (2.2%). Eight patients (17.4%) had leakage through the deep dorsal vein as the only venous site, 17 (36.9%) had leakage through 2 venous sites, 14 (30.4%) had leakage through 3 venous sites and 7 (15.2%) had leakage through 4 venous sites. Correlations among hemodynamic and radiographic observations allowed the identification of 4 different types of cavernosometric findings. While type I represented normal penile vascular findings, types III and IV represented venous leakage. Type II could represent no leak, a mild leak or an undetected arterial problem. Accuracy of interpretation of a study may be improved by taking more than 1 parameter into consideration, including erection maintenance infusion rate, intracavernous pressure decrease within the first 5 seconds after discontinuation of infusion and the final steady state intracavernous pressure. The majority of patients have more than 1 leak site (82.6%). The most commonly combined sites of leakage are the deep dorsal and cavernous veins.
共有50例阳痿患者接受了海绵体测压和海绵体造影,并进行了海绵体内血管活性药物注射。分析了几个血流动力学参数,包括注射血管活性药物和输注生理盐水后的压力反应曲线、达到勃起所需的体积、静脉流出阻力、勃起维持输注速率、停止输注后压力下降速率以及输注后稳态压力。根据海绵体测压结果,排除了4例静脉漏患者。在其余46例患者中,海绵体造影显示的漏血部位包括1例(2.2%)浅表背静脉、46例(100%)深背静脉、32例(69.6%)海绵体静脉、19例(41.3%)龟头和14例(30.4%)海绵体。7例患者(15.2%)记录到异常静脉,其中4例(8.9%)与大隐静脉相通,2例(4.4%)与阴囊静脉相通,1例(2.2%)与股静脉相通。8例患者(17.4%)仅通过深背静脉漏血,17例(36.9%)通过2个静脉部位漏血,14例(30.4%)通过3个静脉部位漏血,7例(15.2%)通过4个静脉部位漏血。血流动力学和影像学观察之间的相关性有助于识别4种不同类型的海绵体测压结果。I型代表正常阴茎血管表现,III型和IV型代表静脉漏。II型可能代表无漏血、轻度漏血或未检测到的动脉问题。通过考虑多个参数,包括勃起维持输注速率、停止输注后前5秒内海绵体内压力下降以及最终稳态海绵体内压力,可以提高研究解释的准确性。大多数患者有不止1个漏血部位(82.6%)。最常见的联合漏血部位是深背静脉和海绵体静脉。