相似文献
1
Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009 May-Jun;48(3):283-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2009.03.001.
2
Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1093-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.053. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
3
Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Summer;26(2):89-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2008.00045.x.
4
A common standard for conflict of interest disclosure in addiction journals.
Addiction. 2009 Nov;104(11):1779-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02594.x.
5
A statement on ethics from the HEART group.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 May 1;71(6):859-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21555.
6
Authors' financial interests should be made known to manuscript reviewers.
Nature. 2007 Jul 12;448(7150):129. doi: 10.1038/448129a.
7
[Lakartidningen's scrutiny routines--equal to the heavies. The peer review system and the expert editorial staff guarantee scientific quality].
Lakartidningen. 2003 Nov 27;100(48):3934-6.
8
Conflicts of interest for medical publishers and editors: protecting the integrity of scientific scholarship.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3 Suppl):59S-63S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.111.
9
A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group.
Circ Res. 2008 May 9;102(9):e104-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.174243.
10
Beautification and fraud.
Nat Cell Biol. 2006 Feb;8(2):101-2. doi: 10.1038/ncb0206-101.
Zotero 插件