Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Mainz, Germany.
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jan;120(1-3):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.04.014.
There is substantial evidence that early improvement (EI) under antidepressant treatment is a clinically useful predictor of later treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorders. The aim of this study was to test whether EI can also be used as a predictor for treatment outcome in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression, i.e. patients, who are typically treated by general practitioners.
Analyses were carried out using data from 223 patients of a 10-weeks randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of sertraline and cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression. EI was defined as a reduction of > or =20% on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) compared with baseline within the first 2 weeks of treatment. The predictive value of EI for stable response at week 8 and 10 (> or =50% HAMD-17 sum score reduction at weeks 8 and 10) and stable remission (HAMD-17 sum score < or =7 at weeks 8 and 10) was evaluated.
In both the sertraline- and CBT-treatment group, EI was a highly sensitive predictor for later stable response (76% and 82%, respectively) and stable remission (70% and 75%, respectively). In patients without EI, only a small proportion of sertraline or CBT-treated patients achieved stable response (20.9% and 5.9%, respectively) or stable remission (18.6% and 8.8%, respectively). Patients with EI were by far more likely to achieve stable response or stable remission than patients without as indicated by high odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 8.1 (3.0-21.8) and 3.8 (1.4-10.1) for sertraline, and 11.1 (2.1-58.4) and 7.2 (1.7-30.8) for CBT-treated patients, respectively.
Sample sizes were relatively low in different treatment groups.
The identification of early improvement might be useful in clinical decision making in the early course of treatment of patients with mild major, minor and subthreshold depression.
有大量证据表明,抗抑郁治疗中的早期改善(EI)是预测重度抑郁障碍患者后期治疗结果的一个临床有用的指标。本研究的目的是检验 EI 是否也可用于预测轻度、中度或亚综合征性抑郁症患者的治疗结果,即通常由全科医生治疗的患者。
使用来自 223 例患者的 10 周随机、安慰剂对照试验数据进行分析,该试验比较了舍曲林和认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗轻度、中度或亚综合征性抑郁症患者的疗效。EI 定义为治疗的前 2 周内,与基线相比,17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)的评分降低≥20%。评估 EI 对第 8 周和第 10 周稳定反应(第 8 周和第 10 周 HAMD-17 总分降低≥50%)和稳定缓解(第 8 周和第 10 周 HAMD-17 总分<7)的预测价值。
在舍曲林和 CBT 治疗组中,EI 都是后期稳定反应(分别为 76%和 82%)和稳定缓解(分别为 70%和 75%)的高度敏感预测指标。在没有 EI 的患者中,只有一小部分舍曲林或 CBT 治疗的患者达到稳定反应(分别为 20.9%和 5.9%)或稳定缓解(分别为 18.6%和 8.8%)。与没有 EI 的患者相比,有 EI 的患者达到稳定反应或稳定缓解的可能性要大得多,这表明舍曲林的优势比(95%置信区间)为 8.1(3.0-21.8)和 3.8(1.4-10.1),CBT 治疗的患者分别为 11.1(2.1-58.4)和 7.2(1.7-30.8)。
不同治疗组的样本量相对较低。
在轻度、中度和亚综合征性抑郁症患者的早期治疗过程中,识别早期改善可能有助于临床决策。