Suppr超能文献

认知行为疗法联合药物治疗对住院治疗抑郁症的疗效。

Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy plus pharmacotherapy in inpatient treatment of depressive disorders.

机构信息

Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Mitte, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):97-106. doi: 10.1002/cpp.795. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Meta-analyses show benefits for patients from a combination of medication and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy. However, it is still unclear whether or not additional cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) also produces a better treatment outcome in a naturalistic psychiatric setting.

METHODS

Two-hundred six consecutively registered acute psychiatric inpatients with a unipolar depressive disorder were treated with additional CBT. This combined therapy was then compared with psychiatric primary care in an inpatient setting (clinical management). In addition to pharmacological treatment, 105 of the 206 patients also received symptom-focused CBT after hospitalization. Seventeen-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD, primary outcome criterion), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Dysfunctional Attitude Scale, Clinical Global Impression Scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning were performed with all patients.

RESULTS

Patients who were treated with additional CBT revealed a considerably greater reduction of depressive symptoms than in patients who received inpatient primary care only (HAMD: -22.21 versus -19.86, p = 0.027; BDI: 14.99 versus 11.36, p = 0.031). Moreover, remission rates were significantly higher (HAMD: 72% to 51%, p = 0.045; BDI: 58.8% versus 43.1%, p = 0.044) in the combined treatment group than in the primary care only group.

LIMITATION

The naturalistic design and the inconsistent pharmacological treatment are design flaws.

CONCLUSION

The results show that additional cognitive-behavioural treatment of depressive disorders notably improves outcome over standard procedure in acute psychiatric treatment.

KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE

There is a need for treatment strategies to accompany medication. In the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression trial (STAR*D), only 33% of the patients reached remission criteria after the first antidepressant treatment step and only 50% after the second step. The strict inclusion criteria of randomized controlled trials often render their patient populations unrepresented. For an accurate view of treatment effectiveness, their results need to be complemented with results gained from trials in clinical practice. Additional cognitive-behavioural treatment notably improves treatment outcomes compared with standard treatments in the acute psychiatric treatment of depressive disorders. The results of this study under naturalistic conditions are an important addition to findings from randomized and controlled studies.

摘要

背景

荟萃分析显示,药物治疗联合认知行为心理治疗对患者有益。然而,在自然精神科环境中,额外的认知行为疗法(CBT)是否也能产生更好的治疗效果仍不清楚。

方法

连续登记了 206 名患有单相抑郁障碍的急性精神科住院患者,给予额外的 CBT。这种联合治疗与住院期间的精神科初级保健(临床管理)进行了比较。除药物治疗外,206 名患者中的 105 名在住院后还接受了以症状为重点的 CBT。所有患者均进行 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD,主要疗效指标)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、功能失调态度量表、临床总体印象量表和总体功能评估。

结果

接受额外 CBT 治疗的患者的抑郁症状缓解程度明显大于仅接受住院初级保健的患者(HAMD:-22.21 对-19.86,p = 0.027;BDI:14.99 对 11.36,p = 0.031)。此外,联合治疗组的缓解率明显高于仅初级保健组(HAMD:72%对 51%,p = 0.045;BDI:58.8%对 43.1%,p = 0.044)。

局限性

自然设计和不一致的药物治疗是设计缺陷。

结论

结果表明,在急性精神科治疗中,抑郁障碍的额外认知行为治疗显著改善了标准治疗的结果。

主要实践意义

需要有治疗策略来配合药物治疗。在序列治疗选择以缓解抑郁(STAR*D)试验中,第一次抗抑郁治疗步骤后只有 33%的患者达到缓解标准,第二次步骤后只有 50%达到缓解标准。随机对照试验的严格纳入标准往往使他们的患者人群无法代表。为了准确了解治疗效果,还需要用临床试验中的结果来补充他们的结果。与标准治疗相比,额外的认知行为治疗在急性精神科治疗抑郁障碍方面显著改善了治疗效果。本研究在自然条件下的结果是对随机对照研究结果的重要补充。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验