Abdel-Salam Zainab, Nammas Wail
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Echocardiography. 2009 May;26(5):541-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00853.x.
Pharmacological stress echocardiography is widely accepted for identifying potential contractile recovery after revascularization. We sought to compare the prognostic power of three pharmacological stress protocols for predicting contractile recovery of myocardial segments at varying degrees of dyssynergy.
We enrolled 100 consecutive patients with significant coronary stenosis amenable for revascularization and regional wall motion abnormality in the distribution of the affected artery. All patients underwent an assessment of regional wall motion according to the standard 16-segment model. The patients underwent three stress echocardiography protocols in separate sessions: low-dose dobutamine, infra-low-dose dipyridamole, and combined protocol. The patients underwent thereafter coronary revascularization either by percutaneous coronary angioplasty or by surgical bypass grafting. A follow-up echocardiography was performed 8 weeks after revascularization to assess regional wall motion abnormality. The predicted recovery by any of the three protocols for each category of segments was compared with actual contractility improvement.
The combined protocol had a significantly higher sensitivity for predicting contractility recovery in all segment categories compared with the other two protocols. In addition, it had a similar specificity in hypokinetic and dyskinetic segments, though with a lower specificity in akinetic segments when compared with the low-dose dobutamine protocol, and a similar specificity in dyskinetic segments, though with a lower specificity in hypokinetic and akinetic segments when compared with the infra-low-dose dipyridamole protocol.
In patients with predominantly akinetic/dyskinetic segments, the combined pharmacological stress protocol would better predict functional recovery after revascularization, as compared with the low-dose dobutamine and the infra-low-dose dipyridamole protocols.
药物负荷超声心动图在识别血运重建后潜在的收缩功能恢复方面已被广泛接受。我们旨在比较三种药物负荷方案对预测不同程度运动失调心肌节段收缩功能恢复的预后能力。
我们连续纳入了100例有严重冠状动脉狭窄且适合血运重建、受累动脉分布区域存在室壁运动异常的患者。所有患者均按照标准的16节段模型进行室壁运动评估。患者在不同时间段接受三种负荷超声心动图检查方案:低剂量多巴酚丁胺、超低剂量双嘧达莫以及联合方案。此后,患者通过经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术或外科搭桥手术进行冠状动脉血运重建。血运重建8周后进行随访超声心动图检查,以评估室壁运动异常情况。将三种方案中任何一种对各节段类别的预测恢复情况与实际收缩功能改善情况进行比较。
与其他两种方案相比,联合方案在预测所有节段类别的收缩功能恢复方面具有显著更高的敏感性。此外,在运动减弱和运动障碍节段中,联合方案具有相似的特异性,不过与低剂量多巴酚丁胺方案相比,在运动消失节段中的特异性较低;在运动障碍节段中,联合方案具有相似的特异性,不过与超低剂量双嘧达莫方案相比,在运动减弱和运动消失节段中的特异性较低。
与低剂量多巴酚丁胺和超低剂量双嘧达莫方案相比,在以运动消失/运动障碍节段为主的患者中,联合药物负荷方案能更好地预测血运重建后的功能恢复情况。