Okamura Kazuki, Ito Masahiro, Tanaka Komei, Chinushi Masaomi, Adachi Takeshi, Mitsuma Wataru, Hirono Satoru, Nakazawa Mikio, Kodama Makoto, Aizawa Yoshifusa
Division of Cardiology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Pharmacology. 2009;83(6):360-6. doi: 10.1159/000218103. Epub 2009 May 13.
The differential effects between olmesartan (OM), an angiotensin 2 type 1 receptor blocker (ARB), and azelnidipine (AZ), a calcium channel blocker (CCB), on atrial structural remodeling were studied in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Eight weeks after treatment, both OM and AZ decreased systolic blood pressure to similar levels. Histological analysis revealed that both OM and AZ had decreased the size of the atrial myocytes and interstitial fibrosis in the atrium, and that the effects of OM were greater than those of AZ. These beneficial effects of OM were associated with less atrial oxidative stress, as assessed by 3-nitrotyrosine staining, and less activation of Rac1, a regulatory component in NADPH oxidase. These results suggest that the ARB was more effective than the CCB in ameliorating atrial structural remodeling due to the suppression of oxidative stress.
在自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)中研究了血管紧张素2 1型受体阻滞剂(ARB)奥美沙坦(OM)和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)阿折地平(AZ)对心房结构重塑的不同影响。治疗8周后,OM和AZ均将收缩压降至相似水平。组织学分析显示,OM和AZ均减小了心房肌细胞大小并减轻了心房间质纤维化,且OM的作用大于AZ。通过3-硝基酪氨酸染色评估,OM的这些有益作用与较少的心房氧化应激以及NADPH氧化酶调节成分Rac1的较少激活有关。这些结果表明,由于抑制了氧化应激,ARB在改善心房结构重塑方面比CCB更有效。