Suppr超能文献

经皮和外科生物瓣膜治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的血流动力学性能比较。

Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.

作者信息

Clavel Marie-Annick, Webb John G, Pibarot Philippe, Altwegg Lukas, Dumont Eric, Thompson Chris, De Larochellière Robert, Doyle Daniel, Masson Jean-Bernard, Bergeron Sebastien, Bertrand Olivier F, Rodés-Cabau Josep

机构信息

Quebec Heart & Lung Institute/Laval Hospital, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 19;53(20):1883-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.060.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to compare the hemodynamic performance of a percutaneous bioprosthesis to that of surgically implanted (stented and stentless) bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent percutaneous aortic valve implantation (PAVI) with the Cribier-Edwards or Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthetic valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Inc., Irvine, California) were matched 1:1 for sex, aortic annulus diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, body surface area, and body mass index, with 2 groups of 50 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a stented valve (Edwards Perimount Magna [SAVR-ST group]), or a stentless valve (Medtronic Freestyle, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota [SAVR-SL group]). Doppler echocardiographic data were prospectively obtained before the intervention, at discharge, and at 6- to 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean transprosthetic gradient at discharge was lower (p < 0.001) in the PAVI group (10 +/- 4 mm Hg) compared with the SAVR-ST (13 +/- 5 mm Hg) and SAVR-SL (14 +/- 6 mm Hg) groups. Aortic regurgitation (AR) occurred more frequently in the PAVI group (mild: 42%, moderate: 8%) compared with the SAVR-ST (mild: 10%, moderate: 0%) and SAVR-SL (mild: 12%, moderate: 0%) groups (p < 0.0001). At follow-up, the mean gradient in the PAVI group remained lower (p < 0.001) than that of the SAVR-ST group, but was similar to that of the SAVR-SL group. The incidence of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch was significantly lower (p = 0.007) in the PAVI group (6%) compared with the SAVR-ST (28%) and SAVR-SL (20%) groups. However, the incidence of AR remained higher (p < 0.0001) in the PAVI group compared with the 2 other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PAVI provided superior hemodynamic performance compared with the surgical bioprostheses in terms of transprosthetic gradient and prevention of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch, but was associated with a higher incidence of AR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经皮生物瓣膜与外科植入(带支架和无支架)生物瓣膜治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的血流动力学表现。

方法

50例接受Cribier-Edwards或Edwards SAPIEN生物瓣膜(Edwards Lifesciences公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市)经皮主动脉瓣植入术(PAVI)的患者,按照性别、主动脉瓣环直径、左心室射血分数、体表面积和体重指数进行1:1匹配,与两组各50例接受带支架瓣膜(Edwards Perimount Magna [SAVR-ST组])或无支架瓣膜(Medtronic Freestyle,美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州 [SAVR-SL组])外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的患者进行比较。干预前、出院时以及6至12个月随访时前瞻性获取多普勒超声心动图数据。

结果

与SAVR-ST组(13±5 mmHg)和SAVR-SL组(14±6 mmHg)相比,PAVI组出院时的平均跨瓣压差较低(p<0.001)(10±4 mmHg)。与SAVR-ST组(轻度:10%,中度:0%)和SAVR-SL组(轻度:12%,中度:0%)相比,PAVI组主动脉瓣反流(AR)发生率更高(轻度:42%,中度:8%)(p<0.0001)。随访时,PAVI组的平均压差仍低于SAVR-ST组(p<0.001),但与SAVR-SL组相似。与SAVR-ST组(28%)和SAVR-SL组(20%)相比,PAVI组严重人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的发生率显著更低(p = 0.007)(6%)。然而,与其他两组相比,PAVI组AR的发生率仍然更高(p<0.0001)。

结论

在跨瓣压差和预防严重人工瓣膜-患者不匹配方面,PAVI与外科生物瓣膜相比具有更好的血流动力学表现,但AR发生率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验