May Arne
Department of Systems Neuroscience, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf , Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, Germany.
Brain. 2009 Jun;132(Pt 6):1419-25. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp116. Epub 2009 May 14.
Neuroimaging analysis using structural data has begun to provide insights into the pathophysiology of headache syndromes. Several independent studies have suggested a decrease in grey matter in pain-transmitting areas in migraine patients. Most of these data are discussed as damage or loss of brain grey matter, reinforcing the idea of migraine as a progressive disease. However, given what we know about the nature of morphometric changes detectable by the methods we have to date, this interpretation is highly speculative and not supported by the data. It is likely that these changes are the consequence and not the cause of the respective headache syndromes, as they are probably not irreversible and only mirror the proportion or duration of pain suffered. Moreover, structural changes are not headache specific and have to be seen in the light of a wealth of pain studies using these methods. The studies in cluster headache patients prompted the use of stereotactic stimulation of the hypothalamic target point identified by functional and structural neuroimaging. Due to the nature of the methods used and due to a high anatomical variance it is more than questionable to use this point as a definite answer to the source of the headache in clusters and even more so when it is uncritically used in individuals. We need a way to study each patient individually using the functional imaging method with the highest spatial and temporal resolution available to enable us to target the seed point for deep brain stimulation on this individual basis. One of the major future challenges is to understand the behavioural consequences and cellular mechanisms underlying neuroanatomic changes in pain and headache.
使用结构数据的神经影像学分析已开始为头痛综合征的病理生理学提供见解。多项独立研究表明,偏头痛患者疼痛传导区域的灰质减少。这些数据大多被讨论为脑灰质的损伤或丧失,强化了偏头痛是一种进行性疾病的观点。然而,鉴于我们对目前所用方法可检测到的形态学变化性质的了解,这种解释极具推测性且无数据支持。这些变化很可能是各自头痛综合征的结果而非原因,因为它们可能并非不可逆转,只是反映了所遭受疼痛的比例或持续时间。此外,结构变化并非头痛所特有,必须结合使用这些方法进行的大量疼痛研究来看待。丛集性头痛患者的研究促使人们对通过功能和结构神经影像学确定的下丘脑靶点进行立体定向刺激。由于所用方法的性质以及解剖学差异很大,将这一点作为丛集性头痛头痛根源的确切答案存在很大疑问,当不加批判地应用于个体时更是如此。我们需要一种方法,使用具有最高空间和时间分辨率的功能成像方法对每位患者进行单独研究,以便我们能够在此个体基础上确定深部脑刺激的种子点。未来的主要挑战之一是了解疼痛和头痛中神经解剖学变化背后的行为后果和细胞机制。