Yumura Junko, Koukita Yoshihiko, Fukuda Ken-ichi, Kaneko Yuzuru, Ichinohe Tatsuya
Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Tokyo Dental College, 1-2-2 Masago, Mihama-ku, Chiba, 261-8502, Japan.
J Anesth. 2009;23(2):203-8. doi: 10.1007/s00540-008-0728-x. Epub 2009 May 15.
In contrast to reports on the classical laryngeal mask airway (classical LMA; CLMA), no report has calculated the 50% and 95% effect-site concentrations (EC(50) and EC(95), respectively) of propofol required for flexible LMA (FLMA) insertion. This study was designed to determine the EC(50) and EC(95) of propofol for FLMA insertion, using probit analysis, and to investigate whether supplemental 0.25 microg x kg(-1) fentanyl decreased these concentrations.
Fifty-nine unpremedicated patients who were scheduled for elective minor oral surgery were randomly allocated to a saline-propofol group (S-P group; n = 30) or a fentanyl-propofol group (F-P group; n = 29). Each group was further divided into four subgroups, in which the propofol EC for FLMA insertion was set at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 microg x ml(-1), respectively, in the S-P group and 1.8, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 microg x ml(-1), respectively, in the F-P group. The experiment was assessed as "successful" when FLMA insertion within 1 min was possible.
The EC(50) and EC(95) in the S-P group were 3.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.83-3.93) and 4.73 (95% CI, 3.94-12.22) microg x ml(-1), and those in the F-P group were 2.13 (95% CI, 1.42-2.60) and 3.54 95% CI, (2.78-34.78) microg x ml(-1), respectively. The EC(50) in the F-P group was significantly lower than that in the S-P group. There were no significant differences in bispectral index (BIS), hemodynamic variables, respiratory rate, and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) between the S-P and F-P groups.
The propofol EC(50) for FLMA insertion was decreased by supplemental 0.25 microg x kg(-1) fentanyl without BIS, hemodynamic, or respiratory depression.
与关于经典喉罩气道(CLMA)的报道不同,尚无研究计算过插入可弯曲喉罩气道(FLMA)所需丙泊酚的50%和95%效应室浓度(分别为EC(50)和EC(95))。本研究旨在采用概率分析确定插入FLMA时丙泊酚的EC(50)和EC(95),并探究补充0.25μg·kg⁻¹芬太尼是否会降低这些浓度。
59例拟行择期小型口腔手术且未使用术前药的患者被随机分为生理盐水-丙泊酚组(S-P组;n = 30)或芬太尼-丙泊酚组(F-P组;n = 29)。每组再进一步分为四个亚组,S-P组中插入FLMA时丙泊酚的EC分别设定为2.5、3.0、3.5和4.0μg·ml⁻¹,F-P组中分别设定为1.8、2.0、2.5和3.0μg·ml⁻¹。当在1分钟内能够插入FLMA时,该实验被评估为“成功”。
S-P组的EC(50)和EC(95)分别为3.29(95%置信区间[CI],2.83 - 3.93)和4.73(95%CI,3.94 - 12.22)μg·ml⁻¹,F-P组的分别为2.13(95%CI,1.42 - 2.60)和3.54(95%CI,2.78 - 34.78)μg·ml⁻¹。F-P组的EC(50)显著低于S-P组。S-P组和F-P组之间在脑电双频指数(BIS)、血流动力学变量、呼吸频率和动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2)方面无显著差异。
补充0.25μg·kg⁻¹芬太尼可降低插入FLMA时丙泊酚的EC(50),且不会导致BIS、血流动力学或呼吸抑制。