Raby Wilfrid Noel, Carpenter Kenneth M, Rothenberg Jami, Brooks Adam C, Jiang Huiping, Sullivan Maria, Bisaga Adam, Comer Sandra, Nunes Edward V
Division on Substance Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Am J Addict. 2009 Jul-Aug;18(4):301-8. doi: 10.1080/10550490902927785.
Naltrexone is a theoretically promising alternative to agonist substitution treatment for opioid dependence, but its effectiveness has been severely limited by poor adherence. This study examined, in an independent sample, a previously observed association between moderate cannabis use and improved retention in naltrexone treatment. Opioid dependent patients (N = 63), admitted for inpatient detoxification and induction onto oral naltrexone, and randomized into a six-month trial of intensive behavioral therapy (Behavioral Naltrexone Therapy) versus a control behavioral therapy (Compliance Enhancement), were classified into three levels of cannabis use during treatment based on biweekly urine toxicology: abstinent (0% cannabis positive urine samples); intermittent use (1% to 79% cannabis positive samples); and consistent use (80% or greater cannabis positive samples). Intermittent cannabis users showed superior retention in naltrexone treatment (median days retained = 133; mean = 112.8, SE = 17.5), compared to abstinent (median = 35; mean = 47.3, SE = 9.2) or consistent users (median = 35; mean = 68.3, SE = 14.1) (log rank = 12.2, df = 2, p = .002). The effect remained significant in a Cox model after adjustment for baseline level of heroin use and during treatment level of cocaine use. Intermittent cannabis use was also associated with greater adherence to naltrexone pill-taking. Treatment interacted with cannabis use level, such that intensive behavioral therapy appeared to moderate the adverse prognosis in the consistent cannabis use group. The association between moderate cannabis use and improved retention on naltrexone treatment was replicated. Experimental studies are needed to directly test the hypothesis that cannabinoid agonists exert a beneficial pharmacological effect on naltrexone maintenance and to understand the mechanism.
纳曲酮在理论上是阿片类药物依赖激动剂替代治疗的一种有前景的替代方法,但其有效性因依从性差而受到严重限制。本研究在一个独立样本中检验了先前观察到的中度使用大麻与纳曲酮治疗中更好的留存率之间的关联。因住院戒毒并开始口服纳曲酮治疗而入院的阿片类药物依赖患者(N = 63),被随机分为强化行为疗法(行为纳曲酮疗法)与对照行为疗法(增强依从性疗法)的六个月试验组,根据每两周一次尿液毒理学检测结果,将治疗期间的大麻使用分为三个水平:戒断(大麻阳性尿液样本为0%);间歇性使用(大麻阳性样本为1%至79%);持续使用(大麻阳性样本为80%或更高)。与戒断使用者(中位数 = 35;均值 = 47.3;标准误 = 9.2)或持续使用者(中位数 = 35;均值 = 68.3;标准误 = 14.1)相比,间歇性大麻使用者在纳曲酮治疗中的留存率更高(留存天数中位数 = 133;均值 = 112.8;标准误 = 17.5)(对数秩检验 = 12.2;自由度 = 2;p = 0.002)。在对海洛因使用基线水平和治疗期间可卡因使用水平进行调整后,该效应在Cox模型中仍具有显著性。间歇性大麻使用还与更高的纳曲酮服药依从性相关。治疗与大麻使用水平存在交互作用,以至于强化行为疗法似乎缓和了持续使用大麻组的不良预后。中度使用大麻与纳曲酮治疗中更好的留存率之间的关联得到了重复验证。需要进行实验研究以直接检验大麻素激动剂对纳曲酮维持治疗产生有益药理作用这一假设,并了解其机制。