Suppr超能文献

无法插管,无法通气!对一家大型教学医院知识与技能的调查。

Can't intubate, can't ventilate! A survey of knowledge and skills in a large teaching hospital.

作者信息

Green Lesley

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jun;26(6):480-3. doi: 10.1097/eja.0b013e3283257d25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Difficult Airway Society protocol for the 'can't intubate, can't ventilate' scenario recommends the use of kink-resistant cannula cricothyroidotomy with transtracheal jet ventilation or surgical cricothyroidotomy. This survey aimed to assess the preparedness of anaesthetists and anaesthetic assistants for emergency tracheal access.

METHODS

Ninety-seven anaesthetists and 63 assistants were asked the location of the two difficult airway trolleys. The anaesthetists were asked for their choice of emergency tracheal access. Those opting for cannula cricothyroidotomy with jet ventilation were asked to demonstrate cannulation of a mock trachea. After insertion of the airway cannula, the time required to attach the jet ventilator to the anaesthetic machine oxygen outlet and insufflate a dummy lung was recorded. The time to connect to a jet ventilator was also recorded for assistants.

RESULTS

Five (5.2%) anaesthetists and 18 (28.6%) assistants knew the location of both airway trolleys. Sixty-one (62.9%) anaesthetists and one (1.6%) assistant did not know the location of either airway trolley. Thirty-six out of ninety-seven (37.1%) anaesthetists chose a method of tracheal access in keeping with Difficult Airway Society guidelines. Thirty-six out of ninety-seven (37.1%) anaesthetists opted for the jet ventilator, but 15 of these 36 (41.7%) could not locate the appropriate oxygen outlet on the anaesthetic machine. The median time [interquartile range (range)] to insufflate the dummy lung for the remaining 21 anaesthetists was 30 [23-32 (5.5-60)] s.

CONCLUSION

There were widespread deficits in 'can't intubate, can't ventilate' knowledge and skills. All participants received a demonstration of equipment, were shown the location and given the opportunity to rehearse a 'can't intubate, can't ventilate' drill.

摘要

背景与目的

困难气道协会针对“无法插管,无法通气”情况的方案推荐使用抗扭结套管环甲膜切开术并进行经气管喷射通气,或行外科环甲膜切开术。本调查旨在评估麻醉医生和麻醉助手应对紧急气管通路的准备情况。

方法

询问了97名麻醉医生和63名助手两个困难气道推车的位置。向麻醉医生询问其对紧急气管通路的选择。那些选择套管环甲膜切开术并进行喷射通气的人被要求演示模拟气管插管。插入气道套管后,记录将喷射通气装置连接到麻醉机氧气出口并向模拟肺充气所需的时间。同时也记录了助手连接喷射通气装置的时间。

结果

5名(5.2%)麻醉医生和18名(28.6%)助手知道两个气道推车的位置。61名(62.9%)麻醉医生和1名(1.6%)助手不知道任何一个气道推车的位置。97名麻醉医生中有36名(37.1%)选择了符合困难气道协会指南的气管通路方法。97名麻醉医生中有36名(37.1%)选择了喷射通气装置,但这36名中的15名(4l.7%)在麻醉机上找不到合适的氧气出口。其余21名麻醉医生向模拟肺充气的中位时间[四分位间距(范围)]为30[23 - 32(5.5 - 60)]秒。

结论

在“无法插管,无法通气”的知识和技能方面存在广泛不足。所有参与者都接受了设备演示,被告知位置,并获得了演练“无法插管,无法通气”操作流程的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验