Affaitati Giannapia, Fabrizio Alessandra, Savini Antonella, Lerza Rosanna, Tafuri Emmanuele, Costantini Raffaele, Lapenna Domenico, Giamberardino Maria Adele
Center of Aging Sciences, Gabriele d'Annunzio Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):705-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.006.
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), a regional pain condition caused by trigger points in muscle or muscle fascia, produces muscle pain, tenderness, and disability. The gold standard of treatment for MPS-infiltration of trigger points with anesthetic-may provoke discomfort to the patients and require medical intervention.
This study was designed to compare the effects of a topical lidocaine patch, a placebo patch, and injection of anesthetic (infiltration) for the symptoms of MPS in terms of pain, disability, and local tissue hypersensitivity, and to determine the acceptability of the lidocaine patch to the patients.
Patients were randomly allocated to receive 1 of 3 treatments: a lidocaine patch applied to the trigger point for 4 days (replacement every 12 hours; total daily dose, 350 mg), a placebo patch applied to the trigger point for 4 days (replacement every 12 hours), or infiltration of the trigger point with two 1-mL injections of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride given 2 days apart. Treatment with the patches was double-blinded, whereas treatment with infiltration was single-blinded. The number of pain attacks, pain intensity at rest and on movement, and pain-related interference with daily activity, work activity, mood, and quality of life were recorded before, during, and after treatment using a visual analog scale (VAS). Pressure and electrical pain thresholds of the skin, subcutis, and muscle in the trigger point, target area, and a pain-free area were evaluated before starting therapy (day 1) and on days 5 and 9. A VAS was used to measure discomfort from therapy, and a diary was given to each patient to record requests for additional treatment (if needed) and adverse effects.
Sixty white patients (46 women and 14 men) 19 to 76 years of age were studied. Mean (SD) age was 46.88 (15.37) years, and mean (SD) weight was 69.58 (13.94) kg. Twenty patients were assigned to each treatment group. Subjective symptoms did not change with placebo, but decreased significantly with the lidocaine patch and infiltration (both, P < 0.001) relative to baseline. Pain thresholds did not vary with the placebo patch, but increased significantly with the lidocaine patch and infiltration (all, P < 0.001); effects at muscle trigger points and target areas were greater with infiltration. Discomfort from therapy was greater with infiltration than with the lidocaine patch. Only patients in the placebo group requested additional treatment (P < 0.001). No adverse events occurred in any group.
Lidocaine patches were effective in, and highly acceptable to, these patients with MPS and high tissue hypersensitivity.
肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是一种由肌肉或肌肉筋膜中的触发点引起的局部疼痛病症,会导致肌肉疼痛、压痛和功能障碍。MPS治疗的金标准——用麻醉剂浸润触发点——可能会给患者带来不适,且需要医疗干预。
本研究旨在比较局部用利多卡因贴片、安慰剂贴片和麻醉剂注射(浸润)对MPS症状在疼痛、功能障碍和局部组织超敏反应方面的影响,并确定利多卡因贴片对患者的可接受性。
患者被随机分配接受以下三种治疗中的一种:将利多卡因贴片贴于触发点4天(每12小时更换一次;每日总剂量350mg),将安慰剂贴片贴于触发点4天(每12小时更换一次),或每隔2天用两次1mL的0.5%盐酸布比卡因对触发点进行浸润注射。贴片治疗采用双盲法,而浸润治疗采用单盲法。在治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录疼痛发作次数、静息和活动时的疼痛强度以及疼痛对日常活动、工作活动、情绪和生活质量的干扰。在开始治疗前(第1天)以及第5天和第9天,评估触发点、目标区域和无痛区域的皮肤、皮下组织和肌肉的压力和电痛阈值。使用VAS测量治疗引起的不适,并给每位患者一本日记,记录额外治疗的需求(如有需要)和不良反应。
研究了60名19至76岁的白人患者(46名女性和14名男性)。平均(标准差)年龄为46.88(15.37)岁,平均(标准差)体重为69.58(13.94)kg。每个治疗组分配20名患者。安慰剂治疗后主观症状未改变,但与基线相比,利多卡因贴片和浸润治疗后主观症状均显著减轻(均P<0.001)。安慰剂贴片治疗后疼痛阈值未变化,但利多卡因贴片和浸润治疗后疼痛阈值均显著升高(均P<0.001);浸润治疗对肌肉触发点和目标区域的效果更佳。浸润治疗引起的不适比利多卡因贴片更大。只有安慰剂组的患者要求额外治疗(P<0.001)。任何组均未发生不良事件。
利多卡因贴片对这些患有MPS和高组织超敏反应的患者有效且高度可接受。