Suppr超能文献

活动性骶髂关节炎的磁共振成像:我们真的需要钆对比剂吗?

Magnetic resonance imaging of active sacroiliitis: do we really need gadolinium?

作者信息

Althoff Christian E, Feist Eugen, Burova Elena, Eshed Iris, Bollow Matthias, Hamm Bernd, Hermann Kay-Geert A

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Aug;71(2):232-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.034. Epub 2009 May 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of active inflammatory changes of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) in spondyloarthritis (SpA) is performed with short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences and fat-saturated T1-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences after administration of gadolinium-based contrast medium (T1/Gd). The aim of the present study was to compare these two pulse sequences in terms of diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and quantification of inflammatory changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 105 patients with suspected SpA; 72 patients developed clinical SpA over time. All patients were examined with STIR and T1/Gd and each of the two sequences was analyzed separately in conjunction with unenhanced T1 FSE images. For quantitative estimation of inflammatory changes, each sacroiliac joint (SIJ) was divided into 4 quadrants (and severity per quadrant was assigned a score of 0-4, resulting in a maximum sum score of 16 per SIJ). Diagnostic confidence was assessed on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10.

RESULTS

Active sacroiliitis was diagnosed in 46 patients and ruled out in 34 using STIR, whereas findings were inconclusive in 25 patients. The corresponding numbers for T1/Gd were 47, 44, and 14. Diagnostic confidence was significantly lower for STIR (7.3+/-2.6) compared with T1/Gd (8.7+/-1.9) (p<0.001). The sum scores were 2.5 (+/-3.3) for STIR and 2.2 (+/-3.2) for T1/Gd for the right SIJ and 2.2 (+/-2.9) (STIR) and 1.9 (+/-3.1) (T1/Gd) for the left SIJ. Agreement was high with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of 0.86 for the right SIJ and 0.90 for the left SIJ and positive correlation (r=0.62 right, 0.60 left).

SUMMARY

STIR sequences alone are sufficient for establishing a reliable diagnosis and quantify the amount of inflammation in active sacroiliitis. A contrast-enhanced study is dispensable in patients with established disease or in the setting of clinical follow-up studies. However, a contrast-enhanced MR sequence is beneficial to ensure maximum diagnostic confidence when patients with early sacroiliitis are examined.

摘要

引言

脊柱关节炎(SpA)中骶髂关节(SIJ)活动性炎症改变的磁共振成像(MRI)检查,是在静脉注射钆基对比剂后,采用短tau反转恢复(STIR)序列和脂肪饱和T1加权快速自旋回波(FSE)序列(T1/Gd)进行。本研究的目的是比较这两种脉冲序列在诊断、诊断置信度以及炎症改变定量方面的差异。

材料与方法

本研究纳入105例疑似SpA患者;其中72例患者随时间推移发展为临床SpA。所有患者均接受STIR和T1/Gd序列检查,并将这两种序列分别与未增强T1 FSE图像联合分析。为了对炎症改变进行定量评估,将每个骶髂关节(SIJ)分为4个象限(每个象限的严重程度给予0-4分,每个SIJ的总分最高为16分)。诊断置信度采用0至10的视觉模拟量表进行评估。

结果

采用STIR序列诊断出46例活动性骶髂关节炎,排除34例,25例结果不明确。T1/Gd序列对应的数字分别为47、44和14。与T1/Gd序列(8.7±1.9)相比,STIR序列的诊断置信度显著较低(7.3±2.6)(p<0.001)。右侧SIJ的STIR序列总分是2.5(±3.3),T1/Gd序列总分是2.2(±3.2);左侧SIJ的STIR序列总分是2.2(±2.9),T1/Gd序列总分是1.9(±3.1)。右侧SIJ和左侧SIJ的组内相关系数(ICC)值分别为0.86和0.90,一致性较高,且呈正相关(右侧r=0.62,左侧r=0.60)。

总结

单独使用STIR序列足以对活动性骶髂关节炎做出可靠诊断并量化炎症程度。对于已确诊疾病的患者或临床随访研究,对比增强检查并非必需。然而,在检查早期骶髂关节炎患者时,对比增强MR序列有助于确保最大诊断置信度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验