Fernandez Julianna, Erstad Brian L, Petty Wanda, Nix David E
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0207, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Aug;64(4):402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 15.
Candidemia and delay to appropriate therapy contribute to increased morbidity and mortality. Current literature addresses the delay between blood culture collection and final identification; however, it fails to delineate differences among species. The purpose of this study was to quantify the time to yeast detection and identification relative to blood culture collection and determine whether differences exist among species. In this retrospective study, all cases of Candida isolation for 2 years were reviewed. The time delays between blood culture and detection of Candida growth were quantified as well as the additional time required for final species identification. Initiation of antifungal therapy was assessed in relation to culture collection, detection of yeast, and final identification. The appropriateness of therapy at each time point was also analyzed. Most Candida infections were caused by either Candida albicans (n = 43) or Candida glabrata (n = 27). Mean time to positive yeast detection for C. albicans was 35.3 +/- 18.1 h, whereas that of C. glabrata was 80.0 +/- 22.4 h (P < 0.0001). Mean time to final identification for C. albicans was 85.8 +/- 30.9, whereas that of C. glabrata was 154 +/- 43.8 h (P < 0.0001). Mean time to appropriate therapy for C. albicans isolates was 43.3 +/- 27.6 h compared with 98.1 +/- 38.3 h (P < 0.0001) for C. glabrata isolates. The time delay between blood culture collection and yeast detection as well as final identification was significantly longer for C. glabrata isolates when compared with C. albicans. As a result, mean time to appropriate antifungal therapy was significantly longer in patients with C. glabrata isolates.
念珠菌血症以及延迟给予恰当治疗会导致发病率和死亡率上升。当前文献关注的是血培养采集与最终鉴定之间的延迟;然而,它未能阐明不同菌种之间的差异。本研究的目的是量化相对于血培养采集的酵母菌检测和鉴定时间,并确定不同菌种之间是否存在差异。在这项回顾性研究中,对2年内所有念珠菌分离病例进行了回顾。对血培养与念珠菌生长检测之间的时间延迟以及最终菌种鉴定所需的额外时间进行了量化。评估了抗真菌治疗的起始时间与培养采集、酵母菌检测及最终鉴定的关系。还分析了每个时间点治疗的恰当性。大多数念珠菌感染由白色念珠菌(n = 43)或光滑念珠菌(n = 27)引起。白色念珠菌酵母菌检测呈阳性的平均时间为35.3 +/- 18.1小时,而光滑念珠菌为80.0 +/- 22.4小时(P < 0.0001)。白色念珠菌最终鉴定的平均时间为85.8 +/- 30.9小时,而光滑念珠菌为154 +/- 43.8小时(P < 0.0001)。白色念珠菌分离株给予恰当治疗的平均时间为43.3 +/- 27.6小时,而光滑念珠菌分离株为98.1 +/- 38.3小时(P < 0.0001)。与白色念珠菌相比,光滑念珠菌分离株从血培养采集到酵母菌检测以及最终鉴定的时间延迟显著更长。因此,光滑念珠菌分离株患者给予恰当抗真菌治疗的平均时间显著更长。