Stockburger Martin, Celebi Oezlem, Krebs Alice, Knaus Thomas, Nitardy Aischa, Habedank Dirk, Dietz Rainer
Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Europace. 2009 Jul;11(7):924-30. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup118. Epub 2009 May 15.
Data from previous defibrillator studies raised concern about right ventricular pacing (RVP) promoting heart failure progression and mortality in implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) patients. The present observational study re-examined the association of RVP, survival, and ventricular tachyarrhythmias/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in routine ICD patients with restrictively programmed pacing.
In 213 ICD patients [183 men, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 37 +/- 15%, follow-up 37 +/- 18 months, no advanced atrioventricular (AV) block], the RVP proportion, survival, and the time to a first appropriate VT/VF episode were assessed. Electrograms were validated and the overall survival was determined. The RVP prevalence was dichotomized at > or = 30% (high RVP) vs. <30% (low RVP). High RVP (RVP 94%, n = 24) and low RVP (RVP 0%, n = 189) patients had similar LVEF, underlying heart disease, ICD indication, and medication. Multivariate Cox regression showed no difference in survival without appropriate VT/VF treatment [odds ratio (OR): 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-2.04, P = 0.83]. Overall survival was significantly more favourable in low RVP patients (OR: 0.34, CI: 0.13-0.91, P = 0.03).
Frequent RVP is associated with impaired survival in ICD patients despite conservative pacing settings. Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator patients requiring concomitant bradycardia pacing should be cared for with particular attention to clinical worsening. Right ventricular pacing prevention and alternative modalities of ventricular pacing need prospective evaluation.
既往除颤器研究的数据引发了人们对右心室起搏(RVP)会促使植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者心力衰竭进展和死亡的担忧。本观察性研究重新审视了常规ICD患者在限制性程控起搏情况下RVP、生存率和室性快速心律失常/心室颤动(VT/VF)之间的关联。
在213例ICD患者中[183例男性,左心室射血分数(LVEF)37±15%,随访37±18个月,无高级别房室(AV)阻滞],评估了RVP比例、生存率以及首次发生适当VT/VF事件的时间。对心电图进行了验证并确定了总生存率。将RVP患病率分为≥30%(高RVP)与<30%(低RVP)两组。高RVP(RVP 94%,n = 24)和低RVP(RVP 0%,n = 189)患者在LVEF、基础心脏病、ICD适应证和药物治疗方面相似。多变量Cox回归显示,在未进行适当VT/VF治疗的情况下,生存率无差异[比值比(OR):0.92,95%置信区间(CI):0.41 - 2.04,P = 0.83]。低RVP患者的总生存率显著更优(OR:0.34,CI:0.13 - 0.91,P = 0.03)。
尽管起搏设置保守,但频繁的RVP与ICD患者生存率受损相关。需要同时进行缓慢性心律失常起搏的植入式心脏复律除颤器患者应得到特别关注,以防临床病情恶化。右心室起搏预防和心室起搏的替代方式需要进行前瞻性评估。