Velik-Salchner Corinna, Maier Stephan, Innerhofer Petra, Kolbitsch Christian, Streif Werner, Mittermayr Markus, Praxmarer Michael, Fries Dietmar
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1747-54. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a198ac.
In this study, we explored whether antiplatelet medications impair whole blood impedance aggregometry after cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) compared with classical light transmission aggregometry (LTA).
Multiplate (M) assays measuring changes in electrical resistance as aggregation units over time, and LTA assays (% aggregation) induced by collagen (COL), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), or arachidonic acid were performed simultaneously using arterial blood samples obtained before induction of anesthesia, 15 min and 3 h after neutralization of heparin in 70 consecutive patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients in Group A (n = 48) discontinued intake of antiplatelet drugs for at least 7 days and served as controls, patients in Group B (n = 11) received aspirin 100 mg/d and those in Group C (n = 11) aspirin 100 mg/d and clopidogrel 75 mg/d (dual antiplatelet therapy) until the day before surgery.
In patients without antiplatelet therapy, 15 min and 3 h after protamine a significant decrease in platelet aggregation was observed with all three agonists and both aggregation methods. In patients receiving aspirin alone, LTA-COL, LTA-ADP and M-ADP changed significantly over time, and ADP assays of both aggregation methods showed a significant decrease in platelet aggregation 15 min after protamine in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. When calculating the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves for discrimination of antiplatelet agents, LTA-COL was able to discriminate between controls and patients receiving aspirin or dual antiplatelet therapy 15 min and 3 h after CPB and the M-ADP assay was able to discriminate between controls and patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy 3 h after protamine.
Whole blood and classical LTA performed with all commonly used agonists enable detection of CPB-induced changes in platelet aggregation in patients not taking antiplatelet medication, whereas in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy, ADP-induced antiplatelet assays are preferable for detecting CPB-induced impairment of platelet aggregation.
在本研究中,我们探讨了与传统的光透射聚集法(LTA)相比,抗血小板药物是否会影响心脏手术及体外循环(CPB)后的全血阻抗聚集法。
使用70例择期冠状动脉搭桥手术患者麻醉诱导前、肝素中和后15分钟及3小时采集的动脉血样本,同时进行多电极血小板功能分析仪(Multiplate,M)检测,该检测以电阻变化作为聚集单位随时间的变化情况,以及LTA检测(%聚集率),LTA检测由胶原蛋白(COL)、二磷酸腺苷(ADP)或花生四烯酸诱导。A组(n = 48)患者至少停用抗血小板药物7天作为对照,B组(n = 11)患者术前每日服用阿司匹林100 mg,C组(n = 11)患者术前每日服用阿司匹林100 mg及氯吡格雷75 mg(双重抗血小板治疗)。
在未接受抗血小板治疗的患者中,使用三种激动剂及两种聚集法,在鱼精蛋白注射后第15分钟和3小时均观察到血小板聚集显著下降。在仅接受阿司匹林治疗的患者中,LTA-COL、LTA-ADP及M-ADP随时间有显著变化,且在接受双重抗血小板治疗的患者中,两种聚集法的ADP检测均显示鱼精蛋白注射后15分钟血小板聚集显著下降。在计算用于区分抗血小板药物的受试者工作特征曲线下面积时,LTA-COL能够在CPB后15分钟和3小时区分对照组与接受阿司匹林或双重抗血小板治疗的患者,M-ADP检测能够在鱼精蛋白注射后3小时区分对照组与接受双重抗血小板治疗的患者。
使用所有常用激动剂进行的全血检测和传统LTA检测能够检测未服用抗血小板药物患者CPB诱导的血小板聚集变化,而在接受抗血小板治疗的患者中,ADP诱导的抗血小板检测更适合检测CPB诱导的血小板聚集受损情况。