Suppr超能文献

致密乳腺实质成像的挑战:磁共振乳腺造影是首选技术吗?一项与乳腺X线摄影和全乳超声的对比研究。

The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.

作者信息

Pediconi Federica, Catalano Carlo, Roselli Antonella, Dominelli Valeria, Cagioli Sabrina, Karatasiou Angeliki, Pronio AnnaMaria, Kirchin Miles A, Passariello Roberto

机构信息

Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Invest Radiol. 2009 Jul;44(7):412-21. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a53654.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To establish the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast in comparison to x-ray mammography and ultrasound for breast cancer evaluation in women with dense breast parenchyma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred thirty-eight women with dense breast parenchyma who were suspicious for breast cancer or inconclusive for the presence of breast lesions based on clinical examination, ultrasound or x-ray mammography, and who underwent breast MRI at 1.5 T before and after administration of 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine were evaluated. Lesions considered malignant (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5) on x-ray mammography and/or ultrasound and as BI-RADS 3, 4, or 5 on MRI were evaluated histologically. Other lesions were followed up at 6 and/or 18 months. The diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values) of each technique was determined and compared using a general linear mixed model with appropriate correction for multiplicity.

RESULTS

At final diagnosis 121 of 238 (50.8%) women had one or more confirmed malignant lesions, whereas 117 (49.2%) had benign lesions or no lesions. Among 97 women who underwent all 3 techniques more lesions (malignant and benign) were detected with breast MRI (n = 135) than with x-ray mammography (n = 85) or ultrasound (n = 107) and diagnostic confidence was greater. In terms of patient-based diagnostic accuracy breast MRI was significantly (P[r] < 0.0001) superior to both x-ray mammography and ultrasound (96.9% accuracy for MRI vs. 60.8% for mammography and 66.0% for US). Malignant lesions were histologically confirmed in 55 of 97 women who underwent all 3 techniques. Breast MRI detected more cases of multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral disease and fewer misdiagnoses occurred. Overall, breast MRI led to a modification of the surgical approach for 28 (23.1%) of the 121 women with diagnosed malignant disease.

CONCLUSION

Breast MRI should be considered for routine breast cancer evaluation in women with dense breast parenchyma.

摘要

目的

与乳腺X线摄影和超声相比,确定乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)在评估乳腺实质致密的女性乳腺癌方面的价值。

材料与方法

对238例乳腺实质致密的女性进行评估,这些女性基于临床检查、超声或乳腺X线摄影怀疑患有乳腺癌或乳腺病变情况不明确,且在静脉注射0.1 mmol/kg钆贝葡胺前后接受了1.5 T乳腺MRI检查。对乳腺X线摄影和/或超声检查中考虑为恶性(乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4或5类)且MRI检查为BI-RADS 3、4或5类的病变进行组织学评估。其他病变在6个月和/或18个月时进行随访。使用通用线性混合模型并进行适当的多重性校正,确定并比较每种技术的诊断性能(敏感性、特异性、准确性以及阳性和阴性预测值)。

结果

最终诊断时,238例女性中有121例(50.8%)有一个或多个确诊的恶性病变,而117例(49.2%)有良性病变或无病变。在接受所有三种检查的97例女性中,乳腺MRI检测到的病变(恶性和良性)比乳腺X线摄影(n = 85)或超声(n = 107)更多,且诊断信心更高。就基于患者的诊断准确性而言,乳腺MRI显著优于乳腺X线摄影和超声(P[r] < 0.0001)(MRI的准确性为96.9%,乳腺X线摄影为60.8%,超声为66.0%)。在接受所有三种检查的97例女性中,有55例恶性病变得到组织学证实。乳腺MRI检测到更多多灶性、多中心性和对侧疾病病例,误诊较少。总体而言,乳腺MRI导致121例确诊为恶性疾病的女性中有28例(23.1%)的手术方式发生改变。

结论

对于乳腺实质致密的女性,应考虑将乳腺MRI用于常规乳腺癌评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验