Beijen J, Snik A F M, Straatman L V, Mylanus E A M, Mens L H M
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Audiol Neurootol. 2010;15(1):36-43. doi: 10.1159/000218361. Epub 2009 May 15.
The aims of the study were to investigate whether sound localization acuity improved when children with 1 cochlear implant use a hearing aid in the contralateral ear (bimodal fitting), and whether this enabled them to benefit from a binaural masking level difference. Four different noise bursts were used as stimuli for a minimal audible angle localization test. On average, localization acuity remained poor with the cochlear implant alone, but also with bimodal fitting. A significant benefit of bimodal fitting was only shown when the most complicated stimulus with roved amplitude and spectrum was presented (minimal audible angle of 151 degrees with bimodal fitting vs. 175 degrees with cochlear implant alone). No significant binaural masking level difference was found between the cochlear implant alone and the bimodal condition.
该研究的目的是调查单侧人工耳蜗植入儿童在对侧耳使用助听器(双耳选配)时,其声音定位敏锐度是否会提高,以及这是否能使他们从双耳掩蔽级差中获益。四种不同的噪声脉冲被用作最小可听角定位测试的刺激源。平均而言,单独使用人工耳蜗时声音定位敏锐度较差,双耳选配时亦是如此。仅在呈现幅度和频谱随机变化的最复杂刺激时,才显示出双耳选配的显著益处(双耳选配时最小可听角为151度,单独使用人工耳蜗时为175度)。单独使用人工耳蜗与双耳选配条件之间未发现显著的双耳掩蔽级差。