Suppr超能文献

遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的遗传风险评估指南:早期分歧和低利用率。

Guidelines for genetic risk assessment of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: early disagreements and low utilization.

机构信息

Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St., Suite 901, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jul;24(7):822-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1009-6. Epub 2009 May 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

BRCA1/2 testing is one of the most well-established genetic tests to predict cancer risk. Guidelines are available to help clinicians determine who will benefit most from testing.

OBJECTIVE

To identify women at high risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and estimate their awareness of and experience with genetic testing for cancer risk.

DESIGN

Analyses of the 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Surveys.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with no personal history of breast or ovarian cancer (n = 35,116).

MEASUREMENTS

Risk of hereditary breast or ovarian cancer based on self-reported family history of cancer and national guidelines; self-reported awareness of genetic testing for cancer risk; discussion of genetic testing for cancer risk with a health professional; having undergone genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer risk.

RESULTS

Using guideline criteria, 0.96% of women were identified as being at high risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Among high-risk women, 54.04% were aware of genetic testing for cancer risk, 10.39% had discussed genetic testing with a health professional, and 1.41% had undergone testing for breast/ovarian cancer risk. Adjusting for survey year, high-risk women were more likely than average-risk women to have heard of genetic testing for cancer risk (RR, 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4), to have discussed genetic testing with a health professional (RR 5.2, 95% CI 3.6-7.4), and to have undergone genetic testing for breast/ovarian cancer risk (RR 6.8, 95% CI 2.6-18.0).

CONCLUSIONS

We find low provision of guideline-recommended advice to women for whom testing may be appropriate and of significant clinical benefit.

摘要

背景

BRCA1/2 检测是预测癌症风险最成熟的遗传检测之一。指南可帮助临床医生确定谁将从检测中获益最大。

目的

确定患有遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险较高的女性,并评估她们对癌症风险遗传检测的认知和体验。

设计

对 2000 年和 2005 年全国健康访谈调查的分析。

参与者

无乳腺癌或卵巢癌个人病史的女性(n=35116)。

测量指标

基于家族癌症史和国家指南的遗传性乳腺癌或卵巢癌风险;自我报告对癌症风险遗传检测的认知;与健康专业人员讨论癌症风险遗传检测;进行乳腺癌/卵巢癌风险的遗传检测。

结果

根据指南标准,0.96%的女性被确定为遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的高危人群。在高危女性中,54.04%知晓癌症风险遗传检测,10.39%与健康专业人员讨论过遗传检测,1.41%进行了乳腺癌/卵巢癌风险的遗传检测。调整调查年份后,高危女性比一般风险女性更有可能听说过癌症风险遗传检测(RR,1.3,95%CI 1.2-1.4),更有可能与健康专业人员讨论遗传检测(RR 5.2,95%CI 3.6-7.4),并且更有可能进行乳腺癌/卵巢癌风险的遗传检测(RR 6.8,95%CI 2.6-18.0)。

结论

我们发现,向可能适合且具有重要临床获益的女性提供指南推荐的检测建议的比例较低。

相似文献

1
Guidelines for genetic risk assessment of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: early disagreements and low utilization.
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jul;24(7):822-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1009-6. Epub 2009 May 20.
2
Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women with breast carcinoma In Situ and referred for genetic testing.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010 Dec;3(12):1579-85. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0218.
4
Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer predisposition in unsolved high-risk breast and ovarian cancer patients.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jun;163(2):383-390. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4181-0. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
5
What Black Women Know and Want to Know About Counseling and Testing for BRCA1/2.
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):344-52. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0740-9.
6
Cancer surveillance behaviors in women presenting for clinical BRCA genetic susceptibility testing.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Mar;36(2):E57-67. doi: 10.1188/09.onf.e57-e67.

引用本文的文献

5
Evaluation and comparison of hereditary Cancer guidelines in the population.
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021 Jul 17;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00188-9.
9
An Applied Framework in Support of Shared Decision Making about Genetic Testing.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:961-969. eCollection 2018.
10
Painting a portrait: Analysis of national health survey data for cancer genetic counseling.
Cancer Med. 2019 Mar;8(3):1306-1314. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1864. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Stimulating the adoption of health information technology.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1477-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0901592. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
2
Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):50-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
3
Collection and use of cancer family history in primary care.
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Oct(159):1-84.
4
5
Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers.
Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(5):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
6
Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
8
Taking family history seriously.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 6;143(5):388-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-5-200509060-00015.
10
Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 6;143(5):355-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-5-200509060-00011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验